Uterine Prolapse Across the Female Lifespan: Clinical Insights and Practical Considerations from Greece

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate uterine prolapse (UP) among women attending a semi-urban health center for routine gynecological examinations. Specifically, the study explores the potential association between UP and various established or suspected risk factors, including age, menopausal status, number and mode of deliveries, birth weight, smoking habits, and body mass index (BMI). Furthermore, it examines the relationship between the presence or severity of UP and the scores of specific questionnaires and their subscales. Finally, the study seeks to develop a predictive model for the likelihood of UP based on questionnaire responses. Methods: A quantitative study was conducted at the gynecological department of a health center in Greece from January 2021 to October 2022. A total of 134 women were recruited using convenience sampling during routine gynecological visits. The degree of prolapse was classified according to the International Continence Society (ICS) Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) classification system. Data collection also included the use of validated instruments: the Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire (APFQ), the Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6), the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20), and the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 (PFIQ-7). The data were processed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) v25. Results: Of the 134 participants, 21 (15.7%) aged 21 to 82 showed signs of UP, while 113 women (84.3%) did not. The average age of the women with UP was 55 years. Fourteen (10.4%) of these women were diagnosed with UP stage I, three of them (2.2%) with stage II, and four of them (3%) with stage III UP. There were no stage IV UP incidents. The risk factors associated with the disease include age, mode of delivery, parity, and duration of menopause. Regarding parity, every subsequent birth after the first one increases the likelihood of a UP incident by approximately 125%. Conclusions: Most women with UP did not exhibit severe symptoms, as UP typically does not manifest symptoms until it reaches a final stage. Considering the population aging and the increase in morbidity, a regular pelvic organ prolapse (POP) checkup should be established to facilitate early recognition, prevention, and treatment of symptoms. This study offers a potential tool for non-invasive screening to facilitate identifying UP in women early, which has not been previously reported.

Keywords: Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire (APFQ); Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system; nursing; pelvic organ prolapse; prevalence; risk factors; uterine prolapse.