Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jan-Dec:34:9636897251348566.
doi: 10.1177/09636897251348566. Epub 2025 Jun 25.

Key mediators of the efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells on in vivo disease models

Affiliations
Review

Key mediators of the efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells on in vivo disease models

Kentaro Nakamura. Cell Transplant. 2025 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are considered to be effective treatments for various diseases, and a wide variety of clinical studies have been performed worldwide. However, substantial obstacles remain before they can be approved and disseminated as treatments. A major bottleneck is the elucidation of their mechanisms of action, and the molecules that are essential for their efficacy have not been fully characterized. In this paper, I review the studies that attempted to identify the key mediators of MSCs that are involved in their effects on disease using in vivo models. More specifically, studies are discussed in which reductions in the efficacy of MSCs in animal models of disease were induced by the absence of key mediators. The target diseases were lung, joint, cerebral nerve, or cardiac diseases and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The following molecules were identified and are discussed herein: TSG-6, VEGF, KGF, HGF, claudin-4, ANXA1, MANF, PYCR1, integrin β1, PDGFRβ, type-II collagen, CD151, TIMP3, TGF-β1, BDNF, COX-2, Botch, IL-1β, CTRP3, CXCR4, miR-34c, FSTL1, IDO, iNOS, IFNγR1, PGES, Chi3l1, and IL-6. These are key mediators of the efficacy of MSCs in vivo.

Keywords: cell therapy product; in vivo; mechanism of action; mesenchymal stem cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract
Graphical abstract was created in BioRender. Nakamura, K. (2025) https://BioRender.com/u98s099
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Number of clinical studies of mesenchymal stem cells and classification of target diseases (total n = 1694). ARDS: acute respiratory distress syndrome; COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019; GVHD: graft-versus-host disease; MSC: mesenchymal stem cell.

Similar articles

References

    1. Moll G, Hoogduijn MJ, Ankrum JA. Editorial: safety, efficacy and mechanisms of action of mesenchymal stem cell therapies. Front Immunol. 2020;11:243. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00243. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Galipeau J, Sensébé L. Mesenchymal stromal cells: clinical challenges and therapeutic opportunities. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;22(6):824–33. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2018.05.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown C, McKee C, Bakshi S, Walker K, Hakman E, Halassy S, Svinarich D, Dodds R, Govind CK, Chaudhry GR. Mesenchymal stem cells: cell therapy and regeneration potential. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2019;13(9):1738–55. doi: 10.1002/term.2914. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mishra VK, Shih HH, Parveen F, Lenzen D, Ito E, Chan TF, Ke LY. Identifying the therapeutic significance of mesenchymal stem cells. Cells. 2020;9(5):1145. doi: 10.3390/cells9051145. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Levy O, Kuai R, Siren EMJ, Bhere D, Milton Y, Nissar N, De Biasio M, Heinelt M, Reeve B, Abdi R, Alturki M, et al. Shattering barriers toward clinically meaningful MSC therapies. Sci Adv. 202;6(30):eaba6884. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba6884. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources