Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Aug 10;43(23):2566-2571.
doi: 10.1200/JCO-24-02477. Epub 2025 Jun 25.

Ruxolitinib in Patients With Corticosteroid-Refractory or Corticosteroid-Dependent Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease: 3-Year Final Analysis of the Phase III REACH3 Study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Ruxolitinib in Patients With Corticosteroid-Refractory or Corticosteroid-Dependent Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease: 3-Year Final Analysis of the Phase III REACH3 Study

Robert Zeiser et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

In REACH3 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03112603), ruxolitinib was investigated versus best available therapy (BAT) for 3 years in patients with steroid-refractory/dependent chronic graft-versus-host-disease (SR/D-cGVHD). Patients received ruxolitinib (10 mg twice daily) or BAT for 24 weeks; thereafter (weeks 24-156), patients continued randomized treatment, entered long-term survival follow-up, or crossed over from BAT to ruxolitinib. In 329 randomly assigned patients (ruxolitinib: 165; BAT: 164), the median failure-free survival (FFS) was 38.4 months for ruxolitinib versus 5.7 months for BAT (hazard ratio, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.27 to 0.49]). Median duration of response (DOR) was not reached for ruxolitinib versus 6.4 months for BAT. Ruxolitinib-treated patients had a higher probability of FFS (ruxolitinib: 56.5%; BAT: 18.2%) and maintaining a response (ruxolitinib: 59.6%; BAT: 26.7%) at 36 months. Median overall survival was not reached. Nonrelapse mortality and malignancy relapse/recurrence events were low. In 70 patients who crossed over to ruxolitinib, the overall response rate (50.0%) at week 24 and best overall response (81.4%) during the crossover period were consistent with the primary analysis of randomly assigned patients. No new safety signals were observed. Ruxolitinib provided longer FFS and DOR than BAT, demonstrating sustained efficacy and manageable safety over 3 years of follow-up in patients with SR/D-cGVHD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated unless otherwise noted. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/jco/authors/author-center.

Open Payments is a public database containing information reported by companies about payments made to US-licensed physicians (Open Payments).

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Kaplan-Meier analysis of (A) FFS and (B) DOR in the full analysis set. FFS is a composite end point that includes relapse/recurrence of underlying disease or death due to underlying disease, nonrelapse mortality, or addition/initiation of another systemic therapy for cGVHD. DOR is defined as the first response until progression, death, or the date of additional systemic therapies. BAT, best available therapy; cGVHD, chronic graft-versus-host disease; DOR; duration of response; FFS, failure-free survival; HR, hazard ratio; NE, not estimable (not reached).
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
(A) ORR at week 24 and (B) BOR up to week 24 of the crossover period in the crossover population and in the primary analysis population at week 24 of the primary treatment period for REACH3. aORR was the primary end point and BOR was a key secondary end point in the primary analysis of the REACH3 at week 24. BAT, best available therapy; BOR, best overall response; CR, complete response; ORR, overall response rate; PR, partial response.

References

    1. Penack O, Marchetti M, Aljurf M, et al. Prophylaxis and management of graft-versus-host disease after stem-cell transplantation for haematological malignancies: Updated consensus recommendations of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Lancet Haematol. 2024;11:e147–e159. - PubMed
    1. Zeiser R, Polverelli N, Ram R, et al. Ruxolitinib for glucocorticoid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:228–238. - PubMed
    1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals . Jakavi (Ruxolitinib) Summary of Product Characteristics. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/jakavi-epar-p...
    1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals . Jakavi (Ruxolitinib) Prescribing Information. https://www.jakafi.com/pdf/prescribing-information.pdf
    1. Lee SJ, Wolff D, Kitko C, et al. Measuring therapeutic response in chronic graft-versus-host disease. National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: IV. The 2014 Response Criteria Working Group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21:984–999. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data