Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun 25.
doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01114-6. Online ahead of print.

The influence of social media on patient and public perception of vasectomy: a narrative review

Affiliations
Review

The influence of social media on patient and public perception of vasectomy: a narrative review

Akash U Patel et al. Int J Impot Res. .

Abstract

This review explores the perception of vasectomy on social media to better understand the current online landscape of men's reproductive health. Evolving sociocultural values and drastic changes in the legal landscape have sparked important conversations about contraception among Americans. Effective contraception options are limited for men. Vasectomy is a safe, reliable, and affordable form of permanent contraception. Men's reproductive health is often stigmatized, and it is paramount to understand the drivers of this stigmatization, especially as interest in vasectomy appears to be rising. Cultural stigmatization is often reflected online. Social media has become ubiquitous in our culture, with both a broad reach and a strong societal influence. Other domains of reproductive health have seen substantial levels of misinformation online. While it is unclear how the male perception of vasectomy has evolved online over the past few years, the recent growing demand creates a unique avenue for urologists to engage in Men's Health both in the clinic and online. Urologist-driven efforts online present the opportunity to address misinformation and help ensure prospective patients are better informed regarding their options for contraception.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

References

    1. Bole R, Lundy SD, Pei E, Bajic P, Parekh N, Vij SC. Rising vasectomy volume following reversal of federal protections for abortion rights in the United States. Int J Impot Res. 2024;36:265–8. - PubMed - DOI
    1. Ellison JE, Brown-Podgorski BL, Morgan JR. Changes in permanent contraception procedures among young adults following the Dobbs decision. JAMA Health Forum. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0424 .
    1. Teal S, Edelman A. Contraception selection, effectiveness, and adverse effects: a review. JAMA. 2021;326:2507–18. - PubMed - DOI
    1. Amory JK. Development of novel male contraceptives. Clin Transl Sci. 2020;13:228–37. - PubMed - DOI
    1. Labbok MH, Queenan JT. The use of periodic abstinence for family planning. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1989;32:387–402. - PubMed - DOI

LinkOut - more resources