Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug;34(8):3629-3630.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09094-3. Epub 2025 Jun 26.

Answer to the Letter to the Editor of N. Khaledian, et al. concerning "Percutaneous pedicle screw placement with a mini-open decompression versus open surgery in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: one-year results of a randomised controlled trial" by A. Broekema, et al. (Eur Spine J [2025]: doi:10.1007/s00586-025-08855-4)

Affiliations

Answer to the Letter to the Editor of N. Khaledian, et al. concerning "Percutaneous pedicle screw placement with a mini-open decompression versus open surgery in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: one-year results of a randomised controlled trial" by A. Broekema, et al. (Eur Spine J [2025]: doi:10.1007/s00586-025-08855-4)

A E H Broekema et al. Eur Spine J. 2025 Aug.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: M.P. Arts received financial support from Zimmer Biomet for his work on this study.

References

    1. Wu H, Xue R, Ding W et al (2023) Comparison of open versus minimally invasive lumbar fusion for single-level degenerative disease: a 10-year follow-up study. World Neurosurg 177:e57–e65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2023.01.072 - DOI
    1. Lau D, Khan A, Terman SW et al (2023) Comparison of long-term outcomes following minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: 5-year results of a matched cohort analysis. Spine J 23(1):79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2022.10.012 - DOI
    1. Bisson EF, Hägg O, Brodke DS et al (2023) Five-year clinical outcomes of minimally invasive vs open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis: results from the quality outcomes database. Neurosurg Focus 54(1):E2. https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.10.FOCUS22596
    1. Phan K, Hogan JA, Mobbs RJ (2017) Cost-utility analysis of minimally invasive versus open TLIF: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Global Spine J 7(4):442–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568217696683 - DOI
    1. Goldstein CL, Macwan K, Sundararajan K, Rampersaud YR (2014) Comparative outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for posterior lumbar fusion: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(6):1727–1737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3421-5 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources