Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 7;17(12):1904.
doi: 10.3390/cancers17121904.

Propofol Total Intravenous Anesthesia for Pediatric Proton Radiotherapy and Its Effect on Patient Outcomes

Affiliations

Propofol Total Intravenous Anesthesia for Pediatric Proton Radiotherapy and Its Effect on Patient Outcomes

Pascal Owusu-Agyemang et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: Patient motion poses significant challenges for the accurate delivery of radiotherapy. In children undergoing proton beam therapy (PBT), up to 30 treatments under general anesthesia may be required over a period of 6 to 8 weeks. To date, the impact of this many iterative anesthetic exposures on patient outcomes remains unclear. Objective: The primary objective of this study was to assess the impact of iterative anesthesia with propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (propofol-TIVA) on overall survival. The secondary objective was to assess the association between propofol-TIVA and the occurrence of an unplanned admission or emergency room visit within 30 days of treatment start. Methods: This was a retrospective study of children (≤19 years) who had undergone PBT (with or without anesthesia) for central nervous system disease. The Log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards models were used for analysis. Propensity score matching and E-value analyses were used to adjust for selection bias. Results: The average age of the 461 children included was 9.0 years (SD ± 4.9). The majority, 261/461 (56.6%), were male, and 267/461 (57.9%) had undergone PBT without anesthesia. The group who underwent PBT with propofol-TIVA were younger (4.7 years vs. 12.2 years, p < 0.001) and had higher proportions of patients with treatment interruptions (111/194 [57.2%] vs. 118/267 [44.2%], p = 0.006), chemotherapy history (64/194 [33.0%] vs. 18/267 [6.7%], p < 0.001), concurrent chemotherapy (37/194 [19.1%] vs. 27/267 [10.1%], p = 0.006), and unplanned admissions/emergency room visits (26/194 [13.4%] vs. 1/267 [0.4%], p < 0.001). Overall survival rates (propofol-TIVA vs. no anesthesia) at 1yr (94% vs. 96%), 2 years (88% vs. 90%), and 3 years (88% vs. 89%) were similar between patient groups (p = 0.558). In the multivariable analysis, PBT with propofol-TIVA was associated with increased odds of an unplanned admission/emergency room visit before (OR, 38.311; 95%CI, 5.139-285.580; p < 0.001) and after (OR, 42.012; 95% CI, 5.322-331.632; p < 0.001; E-value = 83.52) propensity score matching. Conclusions: In this retrospective study of children undergoing PBT for central nervous system disease, there was no association between anesthesia exposure with propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia and overall survival. However, PBT with propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia was associated with an increased risk of an unplanned admission/emergency room visit within 30 days of treatment start.

Keywords: anesthesia; cancer; outcomes; pediatric.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient selection process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier Plots. Undergoing radiotherapy with propofol anesthesia did not impact survival. Interruptions to the course of radiotherapy and a higher number of days of interruption were each associated with worse survival.

References

    1. Debel W., Ramadhan A., Vanpeteghem C., Forsyth R.G. Does the Choice of Anaesthesia Affect Cancer? A Molecular Crosstalk between Theory and Practice. Cancers. 2022;15:209. doi: 10.3390/cancers15010209. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ramirez M.F., Gan T.J. Total intravenous anesthesia versus inhalation anesthesia: How do outcomes compare? Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 2023;36:399–406. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001274. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sessler D.I., Pei L., Huang Y., Fleischmann E., Marhofer P., Kurz A., Mayers D.B., Meyer-Treschan T.A., Grady M., Tan E.Y., et al. Recurrence of breast cancer after regional or general anaesthesia: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;394:1807–1815. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32313-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yan T., Zhang G.H., Wang B.N., Sun L., Zheng H. Effects of propofol/remifentanil-based total intravenous anesthesia versus sevoflurane-based inhalational anesthesia on the release of VEGF-C and TGF-β and prognosis after breast cancer surgery: A prospective, randomized and controlled study. BMC Anesth. 2018;18:131. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0588-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xu Q., Shi N.J., Zhang H., Zhu Y.M. Effects of combined general-epidural anesthesia and total intravenous anesthesia on cellular immunity and prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A comparative study. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017;16:4445–4454. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2017.7144. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources