Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 16;15(12):1773.
doi: 10.3390/ani15121773.

Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Feed Conversion Ratio: A Feasibility Study of Using Short-Term FCR Data for Long-Term Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) Prediction

Affiliations

Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Feed Conversion Ratio: A Feasibility Study of Using Short-Term FCR Data for Long-Term Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) Prediction

Xidi Yang et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Feed conversion ratio (FCR) is a critical indicator of production efficiency in livestock husbandry. Improving FCR is essential for optimizing resource utilization and enhancing productivity. Traditional methods for FCR optimization rely on experience and long-term data collection, which are time-consuming and inefficient. This study explores the feasibility of predicting long-term FCR using short-term FCR data based on machine learning techniques. We employed nineteen machine learning algorithms, including Linear Regression, support vector machines (SVMs), and Gradient Boosting, using historical datasets to train and validate the models. The results show that the Gradient Boosting model demonstrated superior performance, achieving a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.72 and a correlation of 0.85 between predicted and actual values when the testing interval exceeded 40 kg. Therefore, we recommend a minimum feeding measurement interval of 40 kg. Furthermore, when the testing interval was set to 40 kg and further refined to the range of 50-90 kg, the model achieved an R2 of 0.81 and a correlation of 0.90 for FCR prediction in the 30-105 kg range. Among the 19 machine learning algorithms tested, Gradient Boosting, LightGBM, and CatBoost showed superior performance, with Gradient Boosting achieving the best results. Considering practical production requirements, the 50-90 kg feeding stage proved to be the most ideal for FCR testing. This study provides a more effective method for predicting feed efficiency and offers robust data support for precision livestock farming.

Keywords: data prediction; deep learning; feed conversion ratio (FCR); machine learning; precision livestock farming.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure A1
Figure A1
Model Training Parameter Settings.
Figure 1
Figure 1
FCR experimental flowchart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
R2 curves for Gradient Boosting, LightGBM, and CatBoost models.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Predicted scatter plots of Gradient Boosting, LightGBM, and CatBoost models.

Similar articles

References

    1. Petrović B., Bumbálek R., Zoubek T., Kuneš R., Smutný L., Bartoš P. Application of precision agriculture technologies in Central Europe-review. J. Agric. Food Res. 2024;15:101048. doi: 10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101048. - DOI
    1. Yamsani N., Muthukumaran K., Kumar B.S., Asha V., Singh N., Dhanraj J. IoT-Based Livestock Monitoring and Management System Using Machine Learning Algorithms; Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Science Technology Engineering and Management (ICSTEM); Putrajaya, Malaysia. 19–20 December 2024; pp. 1–6.
    1. Prakash A., Saxena V.K., Singh M.K. Genetic analysis of residual feed intake, feed conversion ratio and related growth parameters in broiler chicken: A review. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2020;76:304–317. doi: 10.1080/00439339.2020.1735978. - DOI
    1. Davison C., Michie C., Tachtatzis C., Andonovic I., Bowen J., Duthie C.A. Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) and Performance Group Estimation Based on Predicted Feed Intake for the Optimisation of Beef Production. Sensors. 2023;23:4621. doi: 10.3390/s23104621. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. France J., Theodorou M., Lowman R., Beever D.J.F.S. Feed evaluation models. In: Theodorou M., France J., editors. Feed Evaluation for Animal Production. CAB International; Oxfordshire, UK: 2000. pp. 1–9.

LinkOut - more resources