Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 29;15(6):748.
doi: 10.3390/bs15060748.

Emotional Responses in Clinical Ethics Consultation Decision-Making: An Exploratory Study

Affiliations

Emotional Responses in Clinical Ethics Consultation Decision-Making: An Exploratory Study

Margherita Dahò. Behav Sci (Basel). .

Abstract

Integrating Clinical Ethics Consultants (CECs) into healthcare requires understanding how they apply bioethical knowledge while managing cognitive and emotional challenges in ethical deliberations. Ethical consultations often elicit strong emotions, yet their impact on decision-making remains underexplored. This study explores the emotional responses of 52 CECs from the United States and 10 European countries through a semi-structured survey. Participants selected a real ethical case they had encountered and described their emotional reactions during and after deliberation. Findings revealed that almost 77% of CECs experienced negative emotions such as frustration, sadness, or anger during deliberation, while 21% reported neutral or positive feelings. Although satisfaction and relief increased after deliberation, negative emotions often persisted. Additionally, 45% of participants reported feelings of inadequacy or remorse, 12% expressed uncertainty about their decision, and 5% stated they would change their decision in hindsight. The accumulation of negative emotions may affect CECs' well-being and judgment, highlighting the need for structured support. Managing cognitive and emotional demands is essential to maintaining CECs' effectiveness, underscoring the importance of targeted training programs and support strategies to enhance ethical decision-making and resilience in high-stakes medical contexts.

Keywords: bioethics; clinical ethics; clinical ethics consultants; cognitive psychology; decision-making; emotion; healthcare; medical ethics; moral reasoning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Albisser Schleger H., Oehninger N. R., Reiter-Theil S. Avoiding bias in medical ethical decision-making. Lessons to be learned from psychology research. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy. 2011;14(2):155–162. doi: 10.1007/s11019-010-9263-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alexander D., Quirke M., Greene J., Cassidy L., Hilliard C., Brenner M. The role of bioethics services in pediatric intensive care units: A qualitative descriptive study. BMC Medical Ethics. 2024;25(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01017-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arnsten A. F. Stress signaling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience. 2009;10(6):410–422. doi: 10.1038/nrn2648. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. ASBH (American Society of Bioethics and Humanities) Core competencies for healthcare ethics consultation. 2nd ed. American Society for Bioethics and Humanities; 2011.
    1. Aulisio M. P. Why did hospital ethics committees emerge in the US? AMA Journal of Ethics. 2016;18(5):546–553. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.5.mhst1-1605. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources