Emotional Responses in Clinical Ethics Consultation Decision-Making: An Exploratory Study
- PMID: 40564530
- PMCID: PMC12189864
- DOI: 10.3390/bs15060748
Emotional Responses in Clinical Ethics Consultation Decision-Making: An Exploratory Study
Abstract
Integrating Clinical Ethics Consultants (CECs) into healthcare requires understanding how they apply bioethical knowledge while managing cognitive and emotional challenges in ethical deliberations. Ethical consultations often elicit strong emotions, yet their impact on decision-making remains underexplored. This study explores the emotional responses of 52 CECs from the United States and 10 European countries through a semi-structured survey. Participants selected a real ethical case they had encountered and described their emotional reactions during and after deliberation. Findings revealed that almost 77% of CECs experienced negative emotions such as frustration, sadness, or anger during deliberation, while 21% reported neutral or positive feelings. Although satisfaction and relief increased after deliberation, negative emotions often persisted. Additionally, 45% of participants reported feelings of inadequacy or remorse, 12% expressed uncertainty about their decision, and 5% stated they would change their decision in hindsight. The accumulation of negative emotions may affect CECs' well-being and judgment, highlighting the need for structured support. Managing cognitive and emotional demands is essential to maintaining CECs' effectiveness, underscoring the importance of targeted training programs and support strategies to enhance ethical decision-making and resilience in high-stakes medical contexts.
Keywords: bioethics; clinical ethics; clinical ethics consultants; cognitive psychology; decision-making; emotion; healthcare; medical ethics; moral reasoning.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016. PMID: 27536798
-
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029. Online ahead of print. J Health Organ Manag. 2025. PMID: 40574247
-
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36194890 Free PMC article.
-
Patient and Public Perceptions of 3D Technologies (Models and Images) to Facilitate Health Care Consultations: Exploratory, Mixed Methods Study.JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jun 18;9:e65235. doi: 10.2196/65235. JMIR Form Res. 2025. PMID: 40532187 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35802350 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Jurymen Seldom Rule Against a Person That They Like: The Relationship Between Emotions Towards a Defendant, the Understanding of Case Facts, and Juror Judgments in Civil Trials.Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 16;15(7):965. doi: 10.3390/bs15070965. Behav Sci (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40723748 Free PMC article.
References
-
- ASBH (American Society of Bioethics and Humanities) Core competencies for healthcare ethics consultation. 2nd ed. American Society for Bioethics and Humanities; 2011.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources