Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 12;14(12):4192.
doi: 10.3390/jcm14124192.

Improved Cholesteatoma Removal with CADISS: A Quantitative Ultrastructural Comparison Using VP-SEM

Affiliations

Improved Cholesteatoma Removal with CADISS: A Quantitative Ultrastructural Comparison Using VP-SEM

Michela Relucenti et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Background: Cholesteatoma is a destructive middle ear pathology requiring precise surgical removal to prevent recurrence and preserve auditory function. The chemically assisted dissection (CADISS) system (AuXin Surgery, Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium), based on Mesna (5%), was introduced to enhance tissue separation and minimize residual disease. Objective: This study aimed to compare the cleaning efficiency of CADISS-assisted dissection versus the conventional manual dissection of cholesteatoma from incus bone surfaces using quantitative ultrastructural analysis. Methods: This retrospective study evaluated 67 human incus samples collected during cholesteatoma surgery-35 treated with manual dissection and 32 with CADISS. Samples were imaged using variable pressure scanning electron microscopy (VP-SEM) in hydrated conditions. Clean area/total area ratios were calculated and analyzed statistically using non-parametric tests. Postoperative MRI follow-up at 1 month was conducted to assess residual disease. Results: CADISS-assisted samples demonstrated significantly higher clean area/total area ratios (mean: 0.2095 vs. 0.0478, p < 0.0001). Qualitative imaging showed fewer residuals > 1 mm in the CADISS group (9% vs. 77%). MRI follow-up revealed a lower recurrence rate in the CADISS group (3.1%) compared to manual dissection (11.4%). Conclusions: CADISS-assisted dissection provides superior cholesteatoma debris removal compared to manual methods, as evidenced by VP-SEM imaging and clinical follow-up. This technique may improve surgical outcomes and reduce recurrence risk in middle ear surgery.

Keywords: VP-SEM imaging; chemical-assisted dissection; cholesteatoma surgery; residual disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The CADISS® System kit used in this study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Qualitative evaluation at low magnification of a sample treated with a conventional surgical technique: VP-SEM (A) magnification 13×; (B) 3D reconstruction; (C) the false color image emphasizes the presence of cholesteatoma residues.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A,B) The sample was treated with conventional surgical technique (control VP-SEM): (A) magnification 100× secondary electrons and (B) 100× backscattered electrons; the white area is indicative of exposed bone surface. (C,D) The sample was treated with the CADDIS technique (CADISS VP-SEM): (C) magnification 100× secondary electrons and (D) 100× backscattered electrons; the white area is indicative of exposed bone surface. Note the larger area compared with the control sample.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Area measurement results automatically acquired using the Hitachi Mountains Map software on BSE mode images.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Distribution of clean area and total area values in the manual dissection group.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Distribution of clean and total area values in the CADISS-assisted group.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Box plot comparing clean area/total area ratios. Orange circles are outliers.

Similar articles

References

    1. Yung M., Tono T., Olszewska E., Yamamoto Y., Sudhoff H., Sakagami M., Mulder J., Kojima H., İncesulu A., Trabalzini F., et al. EAONO/JOS joint consensus statements on the definitions, classification and staging of middle ear cholesteatoma. J. Int. Adv. Otol. 2017;13:1–8. doi: 10.5152/iao.2017.3363. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rutkowska J., Özgirgin N., Olszewska E. Cholesteatoma definition and classification: A literature review. J. Int. Adv. Otol. 2017;13:266–271. doi: 10.5152/iao.2017.3411. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Castle J. Cholesteatoma pearls: Practical points and update. Head Neck Pathol. 2018;12:419–429. doi: 10.1007/s12105-018-0915-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vangrinsven J., Van Rompaey V., Casselman J.W. Beyond the otoscope: An imaging review of congenital cholesteatoma. Insights Imaging. 2024;15:123. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01761-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beckmann S., Mantokoudis G., Weder S., Borner U., Caversaccio M., Anschuetz L. Endoscopic cholesteatoma surgery. J. Vis. Exp. 2022;179:e63315. doi: 10.3791/63315. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources