Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun 19;14(12):4363.
doi: 10.3390/jcm14124363.

Techniques for Success in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Reconstruction

Affiliations
Review

Techniques for Success in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Reconstruction

Jenn J Park et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Background: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), given demonstrated oncologic safety, is widely used for both therapeutic and prophylactic mastectomy. The popularity of NSM has spurred advancements by breast and plastic surgeons, liberalizing the indications for NSM and improving patient and aesthetic reconstructive outcomes. This review explores these developments and establishes up-to-date surgical tenets for successful NSM and reconstruction. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library databases, focusing on peer-reviewed studies published up to 2024. Articles were selected based on relevance, quantity, and documentation of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. Results: NSM is utilized frequently for both invasive breast cancers and prophylactic mastectomy, with expanded criteria for candidacy by breast surgeons. Staged procedures such as adjunct reduction, mastopexy, or nipple delay allow patients with larger or ptotic breasts to undergo NSM with comparable outcomes. Long-term outcome studies have identified important risk factors for complications, including smoking history, higher mastectomy weight, certain medical comorbidities, and suboptimal mastectomy flaps. Evolutions in reconstructive decision making in direct-to-implant and staged tissue expander placement have improved aesthetic results while accounting for poor mastectomy flap quality or adjuvant therapy. Long-term outcomes show NSM remains safe and has comparable rates of local recurrence. Patient-reported outcomes demonstrate satisfaction with NSM, especially in sexual and psychological wellbeing metrics. Conclusions: NSM has been demonstrated to be safe in long-term oncologic outcomes. Its widespread popularity over the past ten years has helped identify methods to improve upon surgical and aesthetic outcomes, including decision-making in reconstruction; considerations for challenging patient-related characteristics such as macromastia, ptosis, and NAC asymmetry; and novel advances in areas such as neurotization.

Keywords: breast reconstruction; direct-to-implant; implant; nipple-sparing mastectomy; prepectoral; subpectoral.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
NSM Reconstructive Pathway.

Similar articles

References

    1. Valero M.G., Muhsen S., Moo T.-A., Zabor E.C., Stempel M., Pusic A., Gemignani M.L., Morrow M., Sacchini V.S. Increase in utilization of nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer: Indications, complications, and oncologic outcomes. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2020;27:344–351. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07948-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang M., Huang J., Chagpar A.B. Is nipple sparing mastectomy associated with increased complications, readmission and length of stay compared to skin sparing mastectomy? Am. J. Surg. 2020;219:1030–1035. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.09.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boyd C.J., Salibian A.A., Bekisz J.M., Axelrod D.M., Guth A.A., Shapiro R.L., Schnabel F.R., Karp N.S., Choi M. Long-term cancer recurrence rates following nipple-sparing mastectomy: A 10-year follow-up study. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2022;150:13S–19S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009495. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boyd C.J., Ramesh S., Bekisz J.M., Guth A.A., Axelrod D.M., Shapiro R.L., Hiotis K., Schnabel F.R., Karp N.S., Choi M. Low cancer occurrence rate following prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2024;153:37e–43e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010481. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Romanoff A., Zabor E.C., Stempel M., Sacchini V., Pusic A., Morrow M. A comparison of patient-reported outcomes after nipple-sparing mastectomy and conventional mastectomy with reconstruction. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2018;25:2909–2916. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6585-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources