Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 16;27(6):643.
doi: 10.3390/e27060643.

Brown and Levy Steady-State Motions

Affiliations

Brown and Levy Steady-State Motions

Iddo Eliazar. Entropy (Basel). .

Abstract

This paper introduces and explores a novel class of Brown and Levy steady-state motions. These motions generalize, respectively, the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process (OUP) and the Levy-driven OUP. As the OUP and the Levy-driven OUP: the motions are Markov; their dynamics are Langevin; and their steady-state distributions are, respectively, Gauss and Levy. As the Levy-driven OUP: the motions can display the Noah effect (heavy-tailed amplitudal fluctuations); and their memory structure is tunable. And, as Gaussian-stationary processes: the motions can display the Joseph effect (long-ranged temporal dependencies); and their correlation structure is tunable. The motions have two parameters: a critical exponent which determines the Noah effect and the memory structure; and a clock function which determines the Joseph effect and the correlation structure. The novel class is a compelling stochastic model due to the following combination of facts: on the one hand the motions are tractable and amenable to analysis and use; on the other hand the model is versatile and the motions display a host of both regular and anomalous features.

Keywords: joseph effect and long-range dependence; levy-driven processes; markov processes and Langevin dynamics; memory and correlation; noah effect and heavy tails; ornstein-uhlenbeck processes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The functions ϕ(r) specified in rows #1 to #5 of Table 2. Left panel: red curve—row #1; blue curve—rows #3 and #4. Right panel: green curve—row #2; purple curve—row #5.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The function ϕλ(r) specified in row #6 of Table 3. Left panel: red curve λ = 0.2; blue curve λ = 0.4; green curve λ = 0.6; purple curve λ = 0.8. Right panel: red curve λ = 1.2; blue curve λ = 1.4; green curve λ = 1.6; purple curve λ = 1.8.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The function ϕλ(r) specified in row #8 of Table 3. Left panel: red curve λ = 0.2; blue curve λ = 0.4; green curve λ = 0.6; purple curve λ = 0.8. Right panel: red curve λ = 1.2; blue curve λ = 1.4; green curve λ = 1.6; purple curve λ = 1.8.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The functions ϕλ(r) specified in row #6 (left panel) and in row #8 (right panel) of Table 3, depicted with respect to their parameter λ. In both panels: red curve r = 0.2; blue curve r = 0.4; green curve r = 0.6; purple curve r = 0.8.

Similar articles

References

    1. Uhlenbeck G.E., Ornstein L.S. On the theory of the Brownian motion. Phys. Rev. 1930;36:823. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.36.823. - DOI
    1. Caceres M.O., Budini A.A. The generalized Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process. J. Phys. Math. Gen. 1997;30:8427. doi: 10.1088/0305-4470/30/24/009. - DOI
    1. Bezuglyy V., Mehlig B., Wilkinson M., Nakamura K., Arvedson E. Generalized Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes. J. Math. Phys. 2006;47:073301. doi: 10.1063/1.2206878. - DOI
    1. Maller R.A., Muller G., Szimayer A. Handbook of Financial Time Series. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2009. Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes and extensions; pp. 421–437.
    1. Debbasch F., Mallick K., Rivet J. Relativistic Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process. J. Stat. Phys. 1997;88:945–966. doi: 10.1023/B:JOSS.0000015180.16261.53. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources