Timing Matters: An Observational Study on Circadian Effects of Spinal Anesthesia in Cesarean Delivery
- PMID: 40566547
- PMCID: PMC12194368
- DOI: 10.3390/life15060895
Timing Matters: An Observational Study on Circadian Effects of Spinal Anesthesia in Cesarean Delivery
Abstract
Background: The timing of anesthesia administration may affect drug efficacy and recovery outcomes. Understanding these variations is important for optimizing anesthetic care. Aim: To assess how spinal anesthesia timing affects block duration, postoperative pain, and CRP and cortisol levels in cesarean deliveries. Methods: Ninety women were divided into three groups based on spinal anesthesia timing: Group A (08:00-16:00), Group B (16:00-00:00), and Group C (00:00-08:00). Standardized spinal anesthesia was administered. Sensory/motor blockade and pain (NRS) were assessed every 10 min. Blood samples for CRP and cortisol were collected preoperatively and at 2, 4, 24, and 48 h post operation. Results: Group C showed shorter sensory and motor blockade than Groups A and B (p < 0.05). The time to first analgesic request was longest in Group A, while Group C reported the highest pain scores (p < 0.05). CRP levels were significantly higher in Group B vs. Group A at 24 and 48 h, and vs. Group C at 48 h (p < 0.05). Group B demonstrated the steepest CRP velocity, indicating a more rapid physiological stress response. BMI differences may have influenced biomarker dynamics. Conclusions: Spinal anesthesia timing significantly impacts block duration, pain experience, and the rate of the physiological stress response. CRP velocity may offer additional insights into perioperative inflammation. Circadian considerations should be integrated into anesthetic planning for cesarean deliveries.
Keywords: circadian rhythms; local anesthetics; spinal anesthesia; surgical stress.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection of the data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Similar articles
-
Maternal and neonatal outcomes with the addition of intrathecal midazolam as an adjuvant to spinal anesthesia in cesarean delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.J Clin Anesth. 2022 Sep;80:110786. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110786. Epub 2022 Apr 20. J Clin Anesth. 2022. PMID: 35461171
-
Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 21;5(5):CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29781504 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative efficacy of hyperbaric bupivacaine vs hyperbaric ropivacaine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A meta-analysis.World J Methodol. 2025 Jun 20;15(2):99300. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i2.99300. eCollection 2025 Jun 20. World J Methodol. 2025. PMID: 40548217 Free PMC article.
-
Lower Limb Orthopedic Anesthesia: A Randomized Trial Comparing Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine for Sensory-Motor Block and Hemodynamic Stability.Cureus. 2025 May 18;17(5):e84377. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84377. eCollection 2025 May. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40535370 Free PMC article.
-
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280. Health Technol Assess. 2008. PMID: 18547499
References
-
- Bienert A., Płotek W., Bartkowska-Śniatkowska A., Wiczling P., Przybyłowski K., Grześkowiak E. Selected aspects of chronobiological studies in anaesthesia. Anestezjol. I Ratow. 2014;8:38–50.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous