Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun;29(6):498-503.
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24987. Epub 2025 Jun 5.

Cross-sectional Study: Diagnostic Accuracy of Next-generation Sequencing in a Tertiary Care Intensive Care Unit

Affiliations

Cross-sectional Study: Diagnostic Accuracy of Next-generation Sequencing in a Tertiary Care Intensive Care Unit

Mihika Sawale et al. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Background and aims: Infectious diseases are a major cause of intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, where rapid pathogen identification is crucial. Traditional culture methods are slow and may miss fastidious organisms. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) offers rapid, comprehensive pathogen detection. This study assessed NGS accuracy compared to culture in a tertiary care ICU in India.

Patients and methods: A retrospective observational analysis of 187 ICU patients with suspected infections was conducted with IRB approval. Paired samples from blood, urine, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and other body fluids underwent NGS and culture testing. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated using culture as the reference. Concordance was also assessed.

Results: Next-generation sequencing demonstrated a sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 59.6%, PPV of 62.23%, and NPV of 72.84%. It detected pathogens in 56.68% of cases vs 47.06% by culture, identifying 17 atypical organisms in culture-negative cases. Sensitivity was highest in CSF (100%) and BALF (87.5%), while specificity was highest in pleural fluid (100%) and blood (87.5%). Overall concordance was 57.2%.

Conclusion: Next-generation sequencing has improved pathogen detection, identifying organisms missed by culture. High sensitivity across sample types suggests its value in ICU diagnostics. However, lower specificity, high cost, and standardization challenges limit standalone use.

Clinical significance: Next-generation sequencing facilitates an earlier ICU infection diagnosis, allowing for prompt targeted treatment and potentially reducing antimicrobial resistance. However, false positives and cost remain barriers. Combining NGS with conventional culture techniques could improve diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes in the right subset of patients.

How to cite this article: Sawale M, Raj R, Bhide M, Chanchalani G. Cross-sectional Study: Diagnostic Accuracy of Next-generation Sequencing in a Tertiary Care Intensive Care Unit. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(6):498-503.

Keywords: Culture; Infectious diseases; Intensive care unit; Next-generation sequencing; Pathogen detection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: NoneConflict of interest: None

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Sample type distribution in the study population (N = 187). This pie chart represents the distribution of different sample types analyzed in the study, including plasma, urine, BALF, Endotracheal/tracheal secretions(ET/TT), CSF, and other body fluids (pleural fluid, ascitic fluid, bile, pus, peritoneal fluid and knee aspirate)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Concordance between next-generation sequencing (NGS) and culture. This figure illustrates the concordance between NGS and culture for pathogen detection. The left pie chart categorizes results into double positive (both NGS and culture positive), double negative (both negative), NGS positive only, and culture positive only. The right pie chart splits double positive into the proportion of matched (identical pathogen detection by both methods) and mismatched results

References

    1. Princess I, Vadala R. Clinical microbiology in the intensive care unit: Time for intensivists to rejuvenate this lost art. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021;25(5):566–574. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23869. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gu W, Miller S, Chiu CY. Clinical metagenomic next-generation sequencing for pathogen detection. Annu Rev Pathol. 2018;14:319–338. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012418-012751. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gosiewski T, Ludwig-Galezowska AH, Huminska K, Sroka-Oleksiak A, Radkowski P, Salamon D, et al. Comprehensive detection and identification of bacterial DNA in the blood of patients with sepsis and healthy volunteers using next-generation sequencing method – the observation of DNAemia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017;36(2):329–336. doi: 10.1007/s10096-016-2805-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grumaz S, Stevens P, Grumaz C, Decker SO, Weigand MA, Hofer S, et al. Next-generation sequencing diagnostics of bacteremia in septic patients. Genome Med. 2016;8(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13073-016-0339-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sun C, Zhou C, Wang L, Wei S, Shi M, Li J, et al. Clinical application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of suspected infection in adults: A cross-sectional study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024;103(16):e37845. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037845. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources