Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun;29(6):486-491.
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24979. Epub 2025 Jun 5.

Comparative Performance of Pediatric Risk of Mortality IV and Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 in Critically Ill Children with Cancer: A Prospective Observational Study

Kushal R Kalvit  1 , Shilpushp J Bhosale  2 , Jacob G Pulinilkunnathi  3 , Swapna C Vijayakumaran  4 , Anjana M Shrivastava  2 , Atul P Kulkarni  2
Affiliations

Comparative Performance of Pediatric Risk of Mortality IV and Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 in Critically Ill Children with Cancer: A Prospective Observational Study

Kushal R Kalvit et al. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Background and aims: In pediatric critical care, pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) and pediatric index of mortality (PIM) scoring systems are the most widely used severity of illness scoring systems. The current versions of these scoring systems (PRISM IV and PIM 3) have not been validated in critically ill oncology patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparative performance of PRISM IV and PIM 3 in critically ill children with cancer.

Patients and methods: About 415 critically ill pediatric patients were recruited at a single-center, mixed medical-surgical ICU in a prospective observational study. Patients with an expected ICU stay of greater than 24 h were included. Demographic, physiological, and laboratory parameters required to calculate the PRISM IV and PIM 3 scores were collected; laboratory data from 2 hours prior to 4 hours after admission, and physiological data within 4 hours of admission were collected. The worst value was considered for calculating the scores. Both scores and their predicted mortality risk were calculated using online calculators.

Results: The mortality at ICU discharge and at hospital discharge was 32.7% and 36.1%, respectively. For the prediction of hospital mortality, the AUROC for PRISM IV score was 0.71and the PIM 3 estimated mortality (%) was 0.78, respectively. There was a statistically significant positive correlation between the PRISM IV score and PIM 3 estimated mortality (%) with the hospital mortality. The logistic model for PRISM IV score also passed the goodness-of-fit test indicating a good model fit. The goodness-of-fit test for the PIM 3 model suggests that the model may not fit the data well and may require further investigation or improvement.

Conclusions: Both PRISM IV and PIM 3 scores showed acceptable discriminative ability between survivors and non-survivors in the critically ill pediatric oncology population. However, only the PRISM IV score showed good calibration in the prediction of survival.

How to cite this article: Kalvit KR, Bhosale SJ, Pulinilkunnathi JG, Vijayakumaran SC, Shrivastava AM, Kulkarni AP. Comparative Performance of Pediatric Risk of Mortality IV and Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 in Critically Ill Children with Cancer: A Prospective Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(6):486-491.

Keywords: Mortality; PIM 3; PRISM IV; Pediatric intensive care; Pediatric oncology; Prospective observational study; Scoring methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: Dr Atul P Kulkarni is associated as the Immediate Past Editor-in-Chief of this journal and this manuscript was subjected to this journal's standard review procedures, with this peer review handled independently of Immediate Past Editor-in-Chief and his research group.Conflict of interest: Dr Atul P Kulkarni is associated as the Immediate Past Editor-in-Chief of this journal and this manuscript was subjected to this journal's standard review procedures, with this peer review handled independently of Immediate Past Editor-in-Chief and his research group.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
ROC curves for the PRISM IV and PIM 3 systems
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Calibration plot for PRISM IV score
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Calibration plot for estimated mortality by pediatric index of mortality 3 score
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Desai N, Gross J. Scoring systems in the critically ill: uses, cautions, and future directions. BJA Educ. 2019;19(7):212–218. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2019.03.002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Recher M, Leteurtre S, Canon V, Baudelet JB, Lockhart M, Hubert H. Severity of illness and organ dysfunction scoring systems in pediatric critical care: The impacts on clinician's practices and the future. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:1054452. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1054452. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Niederwanger C, Varga T, Hell T, Stuerzel D, Prem J, Gassner M, et al. Comparison of pediatric scoring systems for mortality in septic patients and the impact of missing information on their predictive power: A retrospective analysis. PeerJ. 2020;8:e9993. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9993. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Farias ECF, Mello MLFMF, Assunção PBC, Wanderley AV, Ferraro KMMM, Machado MMM, et al. Performance of PRISM III and PIM 2 scores in a cancer pediatric intensive care unit. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2021;33:119–124. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20210013. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schneider DT, Lemburg P, Sprock I, Heying R, Göbel U, Nürnberger W. Introduction of the oncological pediatric risk of mortality score (O-PRISM) for ICU support following stem cell transplantation in children. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000;25:1079–1086. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1702403. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources