Machine learning algorithms to predict epidural-related maternal fever: a retrospective study
- PMID: 40567372
- PMCID: PMC12187650
- DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1614770
Machine learning algorithms to predict epidural-related maternal fever: a retrospective study
Abstract
Introduction: The epidural-related maternal fever (ERMF) induced by patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) remains unpredictable. Our objective is to develop ERMF prediction models using real-world data, aiming to identify pertinent contributing factors and support obstetricians in making personalized clinical decisions.
Methods: Women who used patient-controlled epidural analgesia between October 2021 and March 2023 at a tertiary hospital in Jiangsu Province were retrospectively documented. The primary outcome was the occurrence of maternal fever associated with epidural use. We developed six machine learning (ML) models and assessed the area under curve (AUC) for characteristics of subjects' performance, calibration curves, and decision curve analyses.
Results: A total of 1,492 women were enrolled, with 24.3% experiencing ERMF (362 cases). The AUC ratios between the logistic regression (LR) model and the stochastic gradient descent (SGD) models showed statistical significance (p < 0.05), while the differences between the other models were not statistically significant. In comparison to the SVM model, the LR model exhibited better calibration (Brier score: 0.193; calibration slope: 0.715; calibration intercept: 0.062). Consequently, the LR model was selected as the prediction model. Furthermore, the LR-based nomogram identified eight significant predictors of ERMF, including neutrophil percentage, first stage of labor, amniotic fluid contamination during membrane rupture, artificial rupture of membranes, chorioamnionitis, post-analgesic antimicrobials, pre-analgesic oxytocin, post-analgesic oxytocin, and dinoprostone suppositories.
Conclusion: Optimally applying logistic regression models can enable rapid and straightforward identification of ERMF risk and the implementation of rational therapeutic measures, in contrast to machine learning models.
Keywords: Nomograms; epidural-related maternal fever; machine learning; predictive model; risk assessment.
Copyright © 2025 Guo, Zhang and Mei.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Acupuncture or acupressure for induction of labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 17;10(10):CD002962. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002962.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 29036756 Free PMC article.
-
Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 21;5(5):CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29781504 Free PMC article.
-
Discontinuation of intravenous oxytocin in the active phase of induced labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 20;8(8):CD012274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012274.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30125998 Free PMC article.
-
Factors associated with epidural-related maternal fever in low-risk term women: a systematic review.Int J Obstet Anesth. 2023 Nov;56:103915. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2023.103915. Epub 2023 Aug 3. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2023. PMID: 37625990
-
Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more).Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 4;1(1):CD005302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005302.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28050900 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Christodoulou E., Ma J., Collins G. S., Steyerberg E. W., Verbakel J. Y., Van Calster B. (2019). A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 110, 12–22. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.004 - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources