Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 23;18(6):sfaf131.
doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaf131. eCollection 2025 Jun.

The efficacy and safety of kappa opioid receptor (KOR) agonists in patients with uraemic pruritus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Affiliations

The efficacy and safety of kappa opioid receptor (KOR) agonists in patients with uraemic pruritus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Hanqi Yang et al. Clin Kidney J. .

Abstract

Background: Uraemic pruritus (UP) is an increasingly significant health burden. However, current treatments are often unsatisfactory and associated with numerous adverse reactions. Recently, several large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have confirmed that kappa opioid receptor (KOR) agonists, which target the endogenous opioid system, are effective in controlling symptoms. We compared the efficacy and safety of currently available KOR agonists for the treatment of UP.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of RCTs to assess the efficacy and safety of KOR agonists in patients with UP. The primary outcomes were pruritus-related scales and adverse events. Two independent reviewers evaluated RCTs for eligibility and extracted relevant data, with discrepancies resolved by consensus or a third reviewer. We utilized a fixed effects model within a Bayesian framework for the NMA. Dichotomous variables were presented as risk ratios (RRs) and continuous variables were merged using standardized mean differences. Statistical analyses were performed using R 4.2.3 and JAGS 4.3.0. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 tool and the certainty of findings was rated according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020169955).

Results: Ten studies with 2483 participants were included. Concerning the primary endpoints, difelikefalin at doses of 0.25 µg/kg, 0.5 µg/kg, 1.0 µg/kg and 1.5 µg/kg, nalfurafine at 2.5 µg and 5 µg and nalbuphine at 120 mg were significantly effective in reducing itching severity compared with placebo. For the secondary endpoint, all four doses of difelikefalin were associated with higher rates of adverse events compared with placebo, while other interventions showed rates comparable to those of placebo and did not present statistically significant differences.

Conclusion: In summary, difelikefalin at doses of 0.25 µg/kg and 0.5 µg/kg, along with nalfurafine at 0.25 µg/kg and 0.5 µg/kg, can be considered recommended therapeutic options for UP treatment.

Keywords: kappa opioid receptor; network meta-analysis; uraemic pruritus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Flow diagram of study search and selection.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Quality assessment results of risk of bias items in included studies.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Percentages of items of included articles that produced risks of bias.
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
Network map of different dosages of KOR against and placebo for pruritus relief(A-D) and adverse events (E).

Similar articles

References

    1. Ko MJ, Peng YS, Wu HY. Uremic pruritus: pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and treatments. Kidney Res Clin Pract 2023;42:39–52. 10.23876/j.krcp.21.189 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Verduzco H A, Shirazian S. CKD-associated pruritus: new insights into diagnosis, pathogenesis, and management. Kidney Int Rep 2020;5:1387–402. 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.04.027 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sukul N, Speyer E, Tu C et al. Pruritus and patient reported outcomes in non-dialysis CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2019;14:673–81. 10.2215/CJN.09600818 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wu HY, Peng YS, Chen HY et al. A comparison of uremic pruritus in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e2935. 10.1097/MD.0000000000002935 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Min JW, Kim SH, Kim YO et al. Comparison of uremic pruritus between patients undergoing hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Res Clin Pract 2016;35:107–13. 10.1016/j.krcp.2016.02.002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources