Exome sequencing and prenatal skeletal abnormalities: comprehensive review and meta-analysis and way forward
- PMID: 40567897
- PMCID: PMC12188644
- DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1502538
Exome sequencing and prenatal skeletal abnormalities: comprehensive review and meta-analysis and way forward
Abstract
Objective: To assess the detection rate of exome sequencing (ES) in fetuses diagnosed as skeletal abnormalities (SKA) with normal karyotype or chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) results.
Methods: We conducted electronic searches in four databases, focusing on studies involving ES in fetuses with SKA. Additional detection rate of ES compared to karyotype/CMA was calculated, followed by a meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses explored the influence of fetal phenotype on diagnostic outcomes.
Results: From 2,393 studies, 21 reports covering 476 fetuses were analyzed. Key findings include: (1) an additional detection rate of ES of 63.2% (Risk Difference (RD), 0.68 [95% CI, 0.60-0.76], p < 0.00001); (2) identification of 76 genes across 304 types of variants, with FGFR3, COL1A1, COL1A2, and COL2A1 being prevalent; (3) lower detection rates in fetuses with isolated short long bones compared to non-isolated conditions, though not significantly different (p = 0.35); (4) higher detection rates in subgroups with abnormal ossification, small chest, suspected long bone fractures or angulations, and skull abnormalities.
Conclusion: The meta-analysis indicates that genetic variation significantly contributes to fetal SKA, primarily due to single-gene variants. Consequently, ES should be used in the prenatal diagnosis of SKA fetuses in clinical practice.
Keywords: chromosomal microarray analysis; exome sequencing; karyotyping; prenatal diagnosis; skeletal abnormalities.
Copyright © 2025 Jiang, Zhang, Wang, Wei, Mao and Yu.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Diagnostic yield of exome sequencing in fetuses with multisystem malformations: systematic review and meta-analysis.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jun;59(6):715-722. doi: 10.1002/uog.24862. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 35041238
-
Diagnostic Yield of Exome Sequencing in Fetuses with Sonographic Features of Skeletal Dysplasias but Normal Karyotype or Chromosomal Microarray Analysis: A Systematic Review.Genes (Basel). 2023 May 30;14(6):1203. doi: 10.3390/genes14061203. Genes (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37372383 Free PMC article.
-
Should we offer prenatal exome sequencing for intrauterine growth restriction or short long bones? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Apr;228(4):409-417.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.09.045. Epub 2022 Oct 7. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023. PMID: 36209938
-
Diagnostic yield of prenatal exome sequencing in the genetic screening of fetuses with brain anomalies detected by MRI and ultrasonography: A systematic review and meta-analysis.BJOG. 2024 Oct;131(11):1435-1443. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17710. Epub 2023 Nov 6. BJOG. 2024. PMID: 37932235
-
Prenatal diagnosis and clinical pregnancy outcome of fetuses with conotruncal defects in a Chinese cohort.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Jul;170(1):370-377. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.16151. Epub 2025 Jan 30. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025. PMID: 39887707 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Callaway J. L., Shaffer L. G., Chitty L. S., Rosenfeld J. A., Crolla J. A. (2013). The clinical utility of microarray technologies applied to prenatal cytogenetics in the presence of a normal conventional karyotype: a review of the literature. Prenat. Diagn 33 (12), 1119–1123. 10.1002/pd.4209 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous