Psychology of Abortion: A Qualitative Exploration of Women's Quality of Life after Termination of Pregnancy Service Provision
- PMID: 40568308
- PMCID: PMC12110454
- DOI: 10.4314/rjmhs.v7i1.9
Psychology of Abortion: A Qualitative Exploration of Women's Quality of Life after Termination of Pregnancy Service Provision
Abstract
Background: Although safe abortion is a human right, some research indicates that abortion can be considered a life event that could trigger an adverse psychological reaction, including mental ill health, particularly in vulnerable women. Unplanned pregnancies and abortions affect women's mental and physical health while increasing psychological risk; hence, measures are needed to improve the quality of life (QoL) of women post termination of pregnancy (ToP). The purpose of this study was to explore the psychological effects of abortion on women provided with this service in Rwanda, and factors surrounding QoL after service provision.
Methods: An interpretive description design was used. Focus group discussions were used to hear the voices of 30 women and girls who had sought ToP services. The six steps of interpretive description together with framework analysis guided the analysis.
Results: From responses provided by the participants with experience of ToP services five themes and six sub-themes were generated, (1) Ambivalence with mixed feelings and uncertainty, anger, wonder, and frustration; (2) Insecurity and abortion stigma, with judgement and inadequacy; (3) Personalized care with respectful care and dignity and self-reliance; (4) Lack of connection with relationships, coping, and a sense of belonging; (5) Wellness and preferences for care with hope and positive physical health.
Conclusion: The lack of psychological support post ToP negatively affects QoL and indicates an opportunity to include a psychological support package in the ToP service provision, which is the predictor of positive mental health to improve QoL in Rwanda.
Keywords: Rwanda; abortion; psychology; quality of life; support; termination of pregnancy; women.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors affirm that there is no actual or potential conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11532236
-
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024. PMID: 38230967
-
Interventions from pregnancy to two years after birth for parents experiencing complex post-traumatic stress disorder and/or with childhood experience of maltreatment.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 4;5(5):CD014874. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014874.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37146219 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness and safety of vitamin D in relation to bone health.Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007 Aug;(158):1-235. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007. PMID: 18088161 Free PMC article.
-
Immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine devices.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(3):CD001777. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001777. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18;(4):CD001777. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001777.pub2. PMID: 12137634 Updated.
References
-
- Musabwasoni SGM, Ngoga E, Sitini B, Muganda J, Nyiringango G, Tengera O, et al. Lived Experience of healthcare professionals providing safe abortion in Rwanda. Rwanda Med J. 2022. p. 17. Doi: DOI:10.4314/rmj.v79i3.8.
-
- Påfs J, Rulisa S, Klingberg-allvin M, Binder-finnema P, Musafili A, Essén B. Implementing the liberalized abortion law in Kigali, Rwanda: Ambiguities of rights and responsibilities among health care providers. Midwifery. 2020;80:1–6. Doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.102568. - PubMed
-
- Pruett MK, Babb BA. Maternal perinatal and child deaths surveillance and response. Family Court Review. 2020;58:639–640. Doi: 10.1111/fcre.12503.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources