Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 20:iss-2024-0022.
doi: 10.1515/iss-2024-0022. Online ahead of print.

Deep learning for automated boundary detection and segmentation in organ donation photography

Affiliations

Deep learning for automated boundary detection and segmentation in organ donation photography

Georgios Kourounis et al. Innov Surg Sci. .

Abstract

Objectives: Medical photography is ubiquitous and plays an increasingly important role in the fields of medicine and surgery. Any assessment of these photographs by computer vision algorithms requires first that the area of interest can accurately be delineated from the background. We aimed to develop deep learning segmentation models for kidney and liver organ donation photographs where accurate automated segmentation has not yet been described.

Methods: Two novel deep learning models (Detectron2 and YoloV8) were developed using transfer learning and compared against existing tools for background removal (macBGRemoval, remBGisnet, remBGu2net). Anonymised photograph datasets comprised training/internal validation sets (821 kidney and 400 liver images) and external validation sets (203 kidney and 208 liver images). Each image had two segmentation labels: whole organ and clear view (parenchyma only). Intersection over Union (IoU) was the primary outcome, as the recommended metric for assessing segmentation performance.

Results: In whole kidney segmentation, Detectron2 and YoloV8 outperformed other models with internal validation IoU of 0.93 and 0.94, and external validation IoU of 0.92 and 0.94, respectively. Other methods - macBGRemoval, remBGisnet and remBGu2net - scored lower, with highest internal validation IoU at 0.54 and external validation at 0.59. Similar results were observed in liver segmentation, where Detectron2 and YoloV8 both showed internal validation IoU of 0.97 and external validation of 0.92 and 0.91, respectively. The other models showed a maximum internal validation and external validation IoU of 0.89 and 0.59 respectively. All image segmentation tasks with Detectron2 and YoloV8 completed within 0.13-1.5 s per image.

Conclusions: Accurate, rapid and automated image segmentation in the context of surgical photography is possible with open-source deep-learning software. These outperform existing methods and could impact the field of surgery, enabling similar advancements seen in other areas of medical computer vision.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; computer vision; deep learning; image segmentation; transplant surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Median intersection over union (IoU) performance across segmentation methods for kidney and liver retrieval photographs in test and external validation datasets. Includes representative original images, without ground truth annotations, and segmentation outcomes for each method.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparative analysis of segmentation model performance with intersection over union (IoU), dice coefficient (DSC) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Box plots summarise the performance of the segmentation models across kidney and liver images.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves comparing the performance of the image segmentation methods for object detection in retrieval photographs. Performance metrics are indicated for both internal and external validation phases, with ‘chance’ representing a baseline random classifier.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Benchamardimath B, Hegadi R. A Survey on traditional and graph theoretical techniques for image segmentation. Int J Comput Appl. 2014:38–46.
    1. Ramesh KKD, Kumar G, Swapna K, Datta D, Rajest S. A Review of medical image segmentation algorithms. EAI Endorsed Trans Pervasive Health Technol. 2018:169184. doi: 10.4108/eai.12-4-2021.169184. - DOI
    1. Siddique N, Paheding S, Elkin CP, Devabhaktuni V. U-Net and its variants for medical image segmentation: a review of theory and applications. IEEE Access. 2021;9:82031–57.
    1. Fang S, Zhang B, Hu J. Improved mask R-CNN multi-target detection and segmentation for autonomous driving in complex scenes. Sensors. 2023;23:3853. doi: 10.3390/s23083853. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kourounis G, Elmahmudi AA, Thomson B, Hunter J, Ugail H, Wilson C. Computer image analysis with artificial intelligence: a practical introduction to convolutional neural networks for medical professionals. Postgrad Med J. 2023:qgad095. doi: 10.1093/postmj/qgad095. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources