Deep learning for automated boundary detection and segmentation in organ donation photography
- PMID: 40568340
- PMCID: PMC7617812
- DOI: 10.1515/iss-2024-0022
Deep learning for automated boundary detection and segmentation in organ donation photography
Abstract
Objectives: Medical photography is ubiquitous and plays an increasingly important role in the fields of medicine and surgery. Any assessment of these photographs by computer vision algorithms requires first that the area of interest can accurately be delineated from the background. We aimed to develop deep learning segmentation models for kidney and liver organ donation photographs where accurate automated segmentation has not yet been described.
Methods: Two novel deep learning models (Detectron2 and YoloV8) were developed using transfer learning and compared against existing tools for background removal (macBGRemoval, remBGisnet, remBGu2net). Anonymised photograph datasets comprised training/internal validation sets (821 kidney and 400 liver images) and external validation sets (203 kidney and 208 liver images). Each image had two segmentation labels: whole organ and clear view (parenchyma only). Intersection over Union (IoU) was the primary outcome, as the recommended metric for assessing segmentation performance.
Results: In whole kidney segmentation, Detectron2 and YoloV8 outperformed other models with internal validation IoU of 0.93 and 0.94, and external validation IoU of 0.92 and 0.94, respectively. Other methods - macBGRemoval, remBGisnet and remBGu2net - scored lower, with highest internal validation IoU at 0.54 and external validation at 0.59. Similar results were observed in liver segmentation, where Detectron2 and YoloV8 both showed internal validation IoU of 0.97 and external validation of 0.92 and 0.91, respectively. The other models showed a maximum internal validation and external validation IoU of 0.89 and 0.59 respectively. All image segmentation tasks with Detectron2 and YoloV8 completed within 0.13-1.5 s per image.
Conclusions: Accurate, rapid and automated image segmentation in the context of surgical photography is possible with open-source deep-learning software. These outperform existing methods and could impact the field of surgery, enabling similar advancements seen in other areas of medical computer vision.
Keywords: artificial intelligence; computer vision; deep learning; image segmentation; transplant surgery.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Automated segmentation of thoracic aortic lumen and vessel wall on three-dimensional bright- and black-blood magnetic resonance imaging using nnU-Net.J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2025 Jun 11;27(2):101923. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2025.101923. Online ahead of print. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2025. PMID: 40513884
-
Quantification and classification of lumbar disc herniation on axial magnetic resonance images using deep learning models.Radiol Med. 2025 Jun;130(6):795-804. doi: 10.1007/s11547-025-01996-y. Epub 2025 Mar 24. Radiol Med. 2025. PMID: 40126796 Free PMC article.
-
A deep learning approach to direct immunofluorescence pattern recognition in autoimmune bullous diseases.Br J Dermatol. 2024 Jul 16;191(2):261-266. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae142. Br J Dermatol. 2024. PMID: 38581445
-
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 23;5:CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub5. PMID: 33871055 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1:CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3. PMID: 29271481 Free PMC article. Updated.
Cited by
-
Utilizing Detectron2 for accurate and efficient colon cancer detection in histopathological images.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Aug 22;13:1593534. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1593534. eCollection 2025. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025. PMID: 40918447 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Benchamardimath B, Hegadi R. A Survey on traditional and graph theoretical techniques for image segmentation. Int J Comput Appl. 2014:38–46.
-
- Ramesh KKD, Kumar G, Swapna K, Datta D, Rajest S. A Review of medical image segmentation algorithms. EAI Endorsed Trans Pervasive Health Technol. 2018:169184. doi: 10.4108/eai.12-4-2021.169184. - DOI
-
- Siddique N, Paheding S, Elkin CP, Devabhaktuni V. U-Net and its variants for medical image segmentation: a review of theory and applications. IEEE Access. 2021;9:82031–57.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources