Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Preprint]. 2025 Jun 16:2025.06.13.25329599.
doi: 10.1101/2025.06.13.25329599.

Red meat intake interacts with a TGF-β-pathway-based polygenic risk score to impact colorectal cancer risk: Application of a novel approach for polygenic risk score construction

Joel Sanchez Mendez  1 Bryan Queme  2 Yubo Fu  2 John Morrison  2 Juan P Lewinger  2 Eric Kawaguchi  2 Huaiyu Mi  2 Mireia Obón-Santacana  3   4   5 Ferran Moratalla-Navarro  3   4   5   6 Vicente Martín  5   7   8 Victor Moreno  3   4   5   6 Yi Lin  9 Stephanie A Bien  9 Conghui Qu  9 Yu-Ru Su  9 Emily White  9   10 Tabitha A Harrison  9 Jeroen R Huyghe  9 Catherine M Tangen  9 Polly A Newcomb  9   10 Amanda I Phipps  9   10 Claire E Thomas  9 David V Conti  2 Jun Wang  2 Elizabeth A Platz  11 Temitope O Keku  12 Christina C Newton  13 Caroline Y Um  13 Anshul Kundaje  14   15 Anna Shcherbina  14   15 Neil Murphy  16 Marc J Gunter  16   17 Niki Dimou  16 Nikos Papadimitriou  16 Stéphane Bézieau  18 Franzel Jb van Duijnhoven  19 Satu Männistö  20 Gad Rennert  21   22   23 Alicja Wolk  24 Michael Hoffmeister  25 Hermann Brenner  25   26   27 Jenny Chang-Claude  28   29 Yu Tian  28   30 Loïc Le Marchand  31 Michelle Cotterchio  32 Konstantinos K Tsilidis  17 D Timothy Bishop  33 Yohannes Adama Melaku  34   35 Brigid M Lynch  35   36 Daniel D Buchanan  37   38   39 Cornelia M Ulrich  40   41 Jennifer Ose  40   41 Anita R Peoples  40   41 Andrew J Pellatt  42 Li Li  43 Matthew Am Devall  43 Peter T Campbell  44 Demetrius Albanes  45 Stephanie J Weinstein  45 Sonja I Berndt  45 Stephen B Gruber  46 Edward Ruiz-Narvaez  47 Mingyang Song  48   49 Amit D Joshi  48   49 David A Drew  49 Jessica L Petrick  50 Andrew T Chan  48   49   51   52   53   54 Marios Giannakis  53   55 Li Hsu  9   56 Ulrike Peters  9   10 W James Gauderman  2 Mariana C Stern  1
Affiliations

Red meat intake interacts with a TGF-β-pathway-based polygenic risk score to impact colorectal cancer risk: Application of a novel approach for polygenic risk score construction

Joel Sanchez Mendez et al. medRxiv. .

Abstract

Background: High intake of red and/or processed meat are established colorectal cancer (CRC) risk factors. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have reported 204 variants (G) associated with CRC risk. We used functional annotation data to identify subsets of variants within known pathways and constructed pathway-based Polygenic Risk Scores (pPRS) to model pPRS x environment (E) interactions.

Methods: A pooled sample of 30,812 cases and 40,504 CRC controls of European ancestry from 27 studies were analyzed. Quantiles for red and processed meat intake were constructed. The 204 GWAS variants were annotated to genes with AnnoQ and assessed for overrepresentation in PANTHER-reported pathways. pPRS's were constructed from significantly overrepresented pathways. Covariate-adjusted logistic regression models evaluated pPRSxE interactions with red or processed meat intake in relation to CRC risk.

Results: A total of 30 variants were overrepresented in four pathways: Alzheimer disease-presenilin, Cadherin/WNT-signaling, Gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor, and TGF-β signaling. We found a significant interaction between TGF-β-pPRS and red meat intake (p = 0.003). When variants in the TGF-β pathway were assessed, significant interactions with red meat for rs2337113 (intron SMAD7 gene, Chr18), and rs2208603 (intergenic region BMP5, Chr6) (p = 0.013 & 0.011, respectively) were observed. We did not find evidence of pPRS x red meat interactions for other pathways or with processed meat.

Conclusions: This pathway-based interaction analysis revealed a significant interaction between variants in the TGF-β pathway and red meat consumption that impacts CRC risk.

Impact: These findings shed light into the possible mechanistic link between CRC risk and red meat consumption.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

C.M.U. has as cancer center director oversight over research funded by several pharmaceutical companies but has not received funding directly herself.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Pathways overrepresented in CRC, showing the number of variants associated with each pathway and the extent of overlap among annotated variants. CRC; colorectal cancer. Note: Set size and intersection size correspond to the number of single nucleotide polymorphisms contained in each pathway-based Polygenic Risk Score (pPRS) and exhibiting overlap, respectively.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Correlogram for pathway-based polygenic risk scores (pPRS). The numbers correspond to Pearson’s correlation coefficients. Overall PRS contains 204 SNPs that have been previously associated with CRC risk. CRC; colorectal cancer
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Odds Ratios and 95% CI for pathway-based Polygenic Risk Score interactions (pPRSxE) with (A) red meat, and (B) processed meat intake in association with colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. OR; Odds Ratio, CI; Confidence Interval NOTE: The No Pathway PRS contains variants that have previously shown a genome-wide significant association with colorectal cancer but were not overrepresented in biological pathways. For variants that are exclusively overrepresented in a single pathway, a second subset is generated (i.e., “Uniques”) and the appropriate pPRS computed. P-value corresponds to a 1-degree-of-freedom test of pPRSxE. All models were adjusted for study, age, sex, and the first three principal components.

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021. May;71(3):209–49. - PubMed
    1. Morgan E, Arnold M, Gini A, Lorenzoni V, Cabasag CJ, Laversanne M, et al. Global burden of colorectal cancer in 2020 and 2040: incidence and mortality estimates from GLOBOCAN. Gut. 2023. Feb;72(2):338–44. - PubMed
    1. Petimar J, Smith-Warner SA, Rosner B, Chan AT, Giovannucci EL, Tabung FK. Adherence to The World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research 2018 Recommendations for Cancer Prevention and Risk of Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev Publ Am Assoc Cancer Res Cosponsored Am Soc Prev Oncol. 2019. Sep;28(9):1469–79. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clinton SK, Giovannucci EL, Hursting SD. The World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Third Expert Report on Diet, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Cancer: Impact and Future Directions. J Nutr. 2020. Apr 1;150(4):663–71. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Key TJ. Fruit and vegetables and cancer risk. Br J Cancer. 2011. Jan 4;104(1):6–11. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources