A comparative analysis of staple height used for robotic right colectomy
- PMID: 40569493
- DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-02503-1
A comparative analysis of staple height used for robotic right colectomy
Abstract
The use of a closed staple height of less than 3.5 mm in right colon resections remains poorly defined, with limited comparative data against the traditionally used 3.5 mm staplers. To compare rates of anastomotic bleeding and other complications between two staple heights (2.5 mm, white cartridge versus 3.5 mm, blue cartridge) used for intracorporeal isoperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis in robotic right hemicolectomies. This is a retrospective study. The investigation is based on data from a tertiary care center. All patients who underwent a robotic right hemicolectomy or robotic extended right hemicolectomy with an intracorporeal isoperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis for dysplasia or cancer from August 2018 to February 2024. The primary outcome was the anastomotic bleeding rate. A total of 120 patients were included of which 64 patients (53.3%) were female. Group 1 comprised of 52 patients (43.3%) in whom white cartridges were used for ileocolic anastomosis, and group 2 had 68 patients (56.6%) for whom a blue cartridge was used either for the resection of the colon, creation of the anastomosis, or both. A total of 14 patients (11.6%) had anastomotic bleeding. This was managed conservatively with hemodynamic monitoring and blood transfusions in 13 patients (93%), and one patient required a lower endoscopy. The incidence of anastomotic bleeding was almost twice as high in group 2 at 14.7% compared to only 7.6% in group 1 (p = 0.23). No anastomotic leaks were observed in this study. The retrospective nature of the study and inclusion of a single specialized center. The use of staplers with reduced staple height while performing robotic right colon resections may reduce the incidence of bleeding complications without an increase in rates of other complications. Further investigation with large-scale and randomized patient populations is warranted to validate these findings.
Keywords: Anastomotic bleeding; Intracorporeal anastomosis; Robotic right colectomy; Staple height; Surgical outcomes; Surgical stapler.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Similar articles
-
A sutureless overlapped anastomosis technique using linear staplers with reinforced bioabsorbable material in robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis.Colorectal Dis. 2024 Apr;26(4):754-759. doi: 10.1111/codi.16880. Epub 2024 Mar 5. Colorectal Dis. 2024. PMID: 38443753
-
Characterizing advanced stapling technique using objective performance indicators in robotic-assisted sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study.Surg Endosc. 2025 Aug;39(8):4848-4856. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11862-7. Epub 2025 Jun 19. Surg Endosc. 2025. PMID: 40537685
-
Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7;(9):CD004320. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004320.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. PMID: 21901690
-
Stapler size independently predicts postoperative complications following stapled ileocolic anastomosis: A retrospective cohort study.Colorectal Dis. 2024 Feb;26(2):348-355. doi: 10.1111/codi.16841. Epub 2023 Dec 29. Colorectal Dis. 2024. PMID: 38158622
-
Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD004320. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004320.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 07;(9):CD004320. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004320.pub3. PMID: 17636751 Updated.
References
-
- Rajan R, Arachchi A, Metlapalli M et al (2022) Ileocolic anastomosis after right hemicolectomy: stapled end-to-side, stapled side-to-side, or handsewn? Int J Colorectal Dis 37(3):673–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-022-04102-0 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bollo J, Turrado V, Rabal A et al (2019) Randomized clinical trial of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy (IEA trial). Br J Surg 107(4):364–372. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11389 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Golda T, Zerpa C, Kreisler E, Trenti L, Biondo S (2013) Incidence and management of anastomotic bleeding after ileocolic anastomosis. Colorectal Dis 15(10):1301–1308. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12309 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Jurowich C, Lichthardt S, Matthes N et al (2019) Effects of anastomotic technique on early postoperative outcome in open right-sided hemicolectomy. BJS Open 3(2):203–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.101 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Neutzling CB, Lustosa SA, Proenca IM, da Silva EM, Matos D (2012) Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2:Cd003144. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003144.pub2 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources