Feedback in radiology: Essential tool for improving user experience and providing value-based care
- PMID: 40569504
- PMCID: PMC12202251
- DOI: 10.1186/s13244-025-02002-9
Feedback in radiology: Essential tool for improving user experience and providing value-based care
Abstract
Measuring the value that radiology brings to patient care can be challenging. A positive patient experience is consistently associated with patient safety, clinical effectiveness, and outcome measures and is therefore a tool for measuring value-based care. Monitoring the experience of users of radiology services is an indispensable component of quality improvement programmes for radiology departments. The integration of comprehensive feedback mechanisms brings numerous benefits, including enhanced care, strengthened trust, and greater engagement with our stakeholders and service users. Feedback should be collected from a variety of stakeholders through a 360-degree approach, combining both systematically performed structured methods, such as formal surveys, and unstructured methods, such as informal and opportunistic information gathering during multidisciplinary rounds. To maximise the impact of feedback, it should be frequent and diverse, ensuring that all perspectives are considered. Leaders in radiology must prioritise embedding a culture of feedback within their institutions, recognising its crucial role in continuous improvement. It is essential to ensure that our departments consistently provide value to our most important stakeholders-the patients-but also to our referrers and trainees. In this article, we consider methods for collecting feedback and provide some of the key findings from the literature. By fostering an environment that values and acts upon feedback, we can achieve significant advancements in patient care and overall service quality in radiology. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Regular feedback from patients, peers, radiographers, referrers, trainees and other users of imaging services is an essential tool for continuous quality improvement, patient safety and value-based care, enhancing trust and greater engagement with our stakeholders and service users. KEY POINTS: Feedback from patients and referrers, radiographers and radiology trainees, helps radiology departments to identify weaknesses and strengths, and should be fully incorporated into daily practice. Many methods are available for collecting user and stakeholder experience, and these should be implemented as a priority. Acting on stakeholder feedback can improve patient safety and patient experience ratings, leading to a culture of continuous improvement in value-based care.
Keywords: Feedback; Hospital management; Patients; Referrers; Value-based health care.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: A.R.: ESR Executive Council member, Advisory Board, RoClub (virtual share option). J.J.V.: grants to institutions from Promedius/Enlitic/Qure.ai, consulting fees from Philips (payment to the institution), consulting fees from Tegus, payment to the institution for lectures from Roche, travel grant from Qure.ai, participation advisory board from Noaber Foundation, NLC Ventures, Contextflow, and Quibim, phantom shares in Contextflow and Quibim, leadership on the steering committee of the PINPOINT Project (payment to the institution from AstraZeneca), RSNA/ACR Common Data Elements Steering Committee (unpaid), Chair Scientific Committee EuSoMII (unpaid), Chair value-based radiology subcommittee ESR (unpaid), member editorial board European Journal of Radiology (unpaid), and member Board Technical Section (AI) NVvR (unpaid). C.G.-V. member of the Scientific Editorial Board of Insights into Imaging (Section Editor: Gastrointestinal). N.L.-C.: none. P.O.: none. M.-P.R.: member of ESR Executive Council. R.M.S.: none
Similar articles
-
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11532236
-
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May;13(22):1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025. PMID: 40417997 Review.
-
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016. PMID: 27532314
-
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340. Health Technol Assess. 2006. PMID: 16959170
-
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029. Online ahead of print. J Health Organ Manag. 2025. PMID: 40574247
References
-
- Vijan A, Bhagwanani A, Calle F, Brun-Vergara ML (2023) Optimizing patient communication in radiology. Radiographics 43:e230002 - PubMed
-
- Narayan AK, Miles RC, Milton A et al (2023) Fostering patient-centered equitable care in radiology: AJR expert panel narrative review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 221:711–719 - PubMed
-
- Schreyer AG, Schneider K, Dendl LM et al (2022) Patient centered radiology—an introduction in form of a narrative review. Rofo 194:873–881 - PubMed
-
- Fulford KWM, Peile E, Carroll H (2012) Essential values-based practice: clinical stories linking science with people. Cambridge University Press, New York, p 215
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources