Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun;28 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e26447.
doi: 10.1002/jia2.26447.

Implementing the new WHO guidelines on HIV post-exposure prophylaxis: perspectives from five African countries

Affiliations

Implementing the new WHO guidelines on HIV post-exposure prophylaxis: perspectives from five African countries

Sarah Magni et al. J Int AIDS Soc. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is an important component of comprehensive HIV prevention, yet its uptake has been suboptimal globally. In July 2024, the World Health Organization (WHO) updated its global guidance on PEP to include two new recommendations intended to increase timely access to and delivery of PEP. These recommendations specifically aim to expand both where PEP can be delivered, to include community settings, and who can provide PEP, to include community health workers and task-sharing. The practical realities of adopting new public health guidelines to achieve the intended benefits in most contexts are complex. Articulating these realities is important for identifying what will be required to ensure the feasibility of expanded PEP access in community settings.

Discussion: We provide stakeholder perspectives from five African countries-Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda and Zimbabwe-on both barriers to and strategies for implementing the new WHO PEP recommendations. These perspectives are informed by experiences in these countries that were shared at a recent workshop and highlight key themes related to PEP uptake and use: awareness and acceptability; administration and monitoring; policy alignment, including regulatory considerations; logistics; integration of services; stakeholder involvement and capacity building; and linking PEP and PrEP more directly. Running across these themes are the roles of socio-cultural norms and the need for increased resources to pay for implementing the recommendations, including capacity strengthening and monitoring in communities.

Conclusions: While significant challenges exist to expanding PEP access in community settings and through task-sharing, there are examples from our countries of successful efforts to mitigate them by leveraging existing community resources and capacities in innovative ways. Additional efforts will require engagement across multiple stakeholders to address remaining awareness gaps, logistical and regulatory obstacles, and political will. As countries work to update their guidelines and align with the new WHO recommendations, continued collaboration and innovation within and across countries will be essential to realize the full potential of PEP in comprehensive HIV prevention efforts.

Keywords: HIV PEP; HIV prevention; PEP to PrEP; World Health Organization; global guidance; post‐exposure prophylaxis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS . The urgency of now: AIDS at a crossroads. Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS; 2024.
    1. Kamya MR, Balzer LB, Ayieko J, Kabami J, Kakande E, Chamie G, et al. Dynamic choice HIV prevention with cabotegravir long‐acting injectable in rural Uganda and Kenya: a randomised trial extension. Lancet HIV. 2024;11:e736–45. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mayer KH, Allan‐Blitz L‐T. Post‐exposure prophylaxis to prevent HIV: new drugs, new approaches, and more questions. Lancet HIV. 2023;10(12);e816–e24. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allan‐Blitz L‐T, Mayer KH. Missed opportunities: a narrative review on why nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis for HIV is underutilized. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024;11(8):ofae332. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Auerbach JD, Malone S, Forsyth AD. Occupational post‐exposure prophylaxis among healthcare workers: a scoping review of factors affecting optimal utilization. J Int AIDS Soc. 2024;27(8):e26341. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms