Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 26;20(6):e0326562.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326562. eCollection 2025.

Monitoring temporal changes in large urban street trees using remote sensing and deep learning

Affiliations

Monitoring temporal changes in large urban street trees using remote sensing and deep learning

Luisa Velasquez-Camacho et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

In the rapidly changing dynamics of urbanization, urban forests offer numerous benefits to city dwellers. However, the information available on these resources is often outdated or non-existent, leading in part to inequitable access to these benefits for the population. Access to equitable and just green spaces is a challenge for local governments, allowing the city's inhabitants to enjoy a healthy environment. In this context, remote sensing serves as a powerful data source that enables the monitoring of the evolution and dynamics of cities over time, as well as changes in urban forests. For this study, our focus is on large trees, defined as those with a canopy diameter exceeding seven meters. These trees play a vital role in offering ecosystem services that improve the environment, biodiversity, and mental health of the inhabitants of cities. Using deep learning algorithms, we identify the large urban street trees in National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) images and analyze the changes in large street trees over an 18-year period (2005-2022) in six counties of the San Francisco Bay Area. We successfully tracked changes in the presence of large trees in the public right-of-way at the census tract, city, and county levels. We tracked changes in large tree availability at the neighborhood, city, and county levels, revealing socio-demographic disparities. Our analysis found that census tracts with higher household incomes, a greater proportion of individuals who self-identify as white, and more families were positively associated with an increase in large tree canopy. This assessment provides insight into the varying levels of access to ecosystem services offered by large trees across urban environments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No authors have competing interests.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Study area.
Urban lands in the San Francisco Bay are represented by the red polygon.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Left panel: Predicted number of large streets trees vs ground truth number of large street trees by plot.
Right panel: Predicted number of large street trees vs ground truth number of large street trees by plot vs the correction with the statistical model. Dash line indicates variability.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Left: Variation of the rate of change of large trees per neighborhood by year.
Right: Estimated effect of variables (large street tree density, percentage of cover, canopy area and, number of trees) on the rate of change of large trees per neighborhood by year. The dashed line indicates variability.
Fig 4
Fig 4. A. Map of the normalized number of large street trees by km2 in 2005 B: Normalized total rate of change (trees per year) on large street trees by neighborhood.
C: Normalized total rate of change (trees per year) on large street trees by city. D: Normalized total rate of change (trees per year) on large street trees by county in the San Francisco Bay Area.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Estimated effects of social variables on average canopy coverage per neighborhood (left panel) and the average large street trees per capita (right panel).
The dash area indicates the data variability.

Similar articles

References

    1. McPherson EG, Peper PP. Costs of street tree damage to infrastructure. Arboricultural Journal. 1996;20(2):143–60. doi: 10.1080/03071375.1996.9747110 - DOI
    1. Bigelow Jr LM, Fahey RT, Grabosky J, Hallett RA, Henning JG, Johnson ML. Predictors of street tree survival in Philadelphia: Tree traits, biophysical environment, and socioeconomic context. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2024;94:128284.
    1. Nowak DJ. The interactions between urban forests and global climate change. Global climate change & the urban forest. 2000. p. 31–4.
    1. Hauer R, Peterson W. Municipal tree care and management in the United States. Population. 2015;25:10–000.
    1. Salmond JA, Tadaki M, Vardoulakis S, Arbuthnott K, Coutts A, Demuzere M. Health and climate related ecosystem services provided by street trees in the urban environment. Environmental Health. 2016;15:95–111. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources