Goals and Priorities of Community Members Regarding the Federally Mandated Medicaid Sterilization Policy
- PMID: 40839879
- PMCID: PMC12353952
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005988
Goals and Priorities of Community Members Regarding the Federally Mandated Medicaid Sterilization Policy
Abstract
Objective: To describe the opinions of community members who are potentially eligible for Medicaid insurance regarding the 30-day sterilization waiting period.
Methods: This mixed-methods study consisted of 10 informed deliberation sessions with 85 Michigan residents with low income (aged 21-51 years) between April and June 2024 to explore and describe their thoughts about the waiting period and suggested revisions to the policy. The deliberation sessions included policy education, expert questions and answers, facilitator-led discussion, and a small-group exercise on potential policy options. Participants completed presurveys and postsurveys measuring knowledge and opinions about contraception and the Medicaid sterilization policy and validated scales regarding contraceptive autonomy, health care experience, and discrimination.
Results: Deliberators favored replacing the current policy with a revised policy that includes a reduced or eliminated waiting period that applies to all individuals, not solely to those with Medicaid insurance. They also recommended revising the informed consent process for clarity, accessibility, openness to discussion, and timeliness.
Conclusion: Groups with low income who engaged in informed deliberations recommended replacing the current policy, indicating that the policy does not serve the goals of the communities most affected.
Copyright © 2025 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Financial Disclosure Kavita Shah Arora and Suzanna Larkin received funding through the NICHD R01 as well as administrative supplement listed below. Susan Dorr Goold's institution received funding from the University of North Carolina, a subcontract from the NICHD, Administrative Supplement to R01, and from the University of Pennsylvania NIMHD R01 subcontract. Jessie Milne, Gloria Carmona Clavijo, and Suzie Williamson all received funding through this NICHD Administrative Supplement (PI—Arora). She received funding from the University of Colorado, and her institution received payment from the NSF award to School of Information, University of Michigan. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training.2024 Mar 29. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2024 Mar 29. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 36508513 Free Books & Documents.
-
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks.2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 30726003 Free Books & Documents.
-
Interventions for preventing and reducing the use of physical restraints for older people in all long-term care settings.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 28;7(7):CD007546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007546.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37500094 Free PMC article.
-
Strategies for communicating contraceptive effectiveness.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;2013(4):CD006964. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006964.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 23633337 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Daniels K, Abma J. NCHS Data Brief No. 388: Current Contraceptive Status Among Women Aged 15–49: United States, 2017–2019.; 2020. - PubMed
-
- Weinberger Relf v.. Southern Poverty Law Center. Accessed April 10, 2023. https://www.splcenter.org/resources/civil-rights-case-docket/relf-v-wein...
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous