Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 27;146(3):394-401.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005988.

Goals and Priorities of Community Members Regarding the Federally Mandated Medicaid Sterilization Policy

Affiliations

Goals and Priorities of Community Members Regarding the Federally Mandated Medicaid Sterilization Policy

Kavita Shah Arora et al. Obstet Gynecol. .

Abstract

Objective: To describe the opinions of community members who are potentially eligible for Medicaid insurance regarding the 30-day sterilization waiting period.

Methods: This mixed-methods study consisted of 10 informed deliberation sessions with 85 Michigan residents with low income (aged 21-51 years) between April and June 2024 to explore and describe their thoughts about the waiting period and suggested revisions to the policy. The deliberation sessions included policy education, expert questions and answers, facilitator-led discussion, and a small-group exercise on potential policy options. Participants completed presurveys and postsurveys measuring knowledge and opinions about contraception and the Medicaid sterilization policy and validated scales regarding contraceptive autonomy, health care experience, and discrimination.

Results: Deliberators favored replacing the current policy with a revised policy that includes a reduced or eliminated waiting period that applies to all individuals, not solely to those with Medicaid insurance. They also recommended revising the informed consent process for clarity, accessibility, openness to discussion, and timeliness.

Conclusion: Groups with low income who engaged in informed deliberations recommended replacing the current policy, indicating that the policy does not serve the goals of the communities most affected.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial Disclosure Kavita Shah Arora and Suzanna Larkin received funding through the NICHD R01 as well as administrative supplement listed below. Susan Dorr Goold's institution received funding from the University of North Carolina, a subcontract from the NICHD, Administrative Supplement to R01, and from the University of Pennsylvania NIMHD R01 subcontract. Jessie Milne, Gloria Carmona Clavijo, and Suzie Williamson all received funding through this NICHD Administrative Supplement (PI—Arora). She received funding from the University of Colorado, and her institution received payment from the NSF award to School of Information, University of Michigan. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Daniels K, Abma J. NCHS Data Brief No. 388: Current Contraceptive Status Among Women Aged 15–49: United States, 2017–2019.; 2020. - PubMed
    1. Weinberger Relf v.. Southern Poverty Law Center. Accessed April 10, 2023. https://www.splcenter.org/resources/civil-rights-case-docket/relf-v-wein...
    1. Block-Abraham D, Arora KS, Tate D, Gee RE. Medicaid Consent to Sterilization Forms. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;58(2):409–417. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000110 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Borrero S, Zite N, Potter JE, Trussell J. Medicaid Policy on Sterilization — Anachronistic or Still Relevant? New England Journal of Medicine. 2014;370(2):102–104. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1313325 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Committee on Health Care for Underserved Women. Committee Opinion No. 530: Access to Postpartum Sterilization. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2012;120(1):212–215. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318262e354 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources