Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 24;301(8):110414.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2025.110414. Online ahead of print.

Microcurrent stimulation induces cell death in p53-mutant and 5-FU-resistant breast cancer

Affiliations

Microcurrent stimulation induces cell death in p53-mutant and 5-FU-resistant breast cancer

Tomohito Tanihara et al. J Biol Chem. .

Abstract

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a commonly used chemotherapeutic agent for breast cancer. Its efficacy relies on the function of p53, and mutations in p53 contribute to the development of resistance during 5-FU chemotherapy. Here, we report that microcurrent stimulation (MCS) of a p53-mutant breast cancer cell line induces p53-mediated cell death. Although MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cells, both human breast cancer cell lines, are less sensitive to 5-FU due to p53 mutations, MCS (300 μA for 30 min) induced apoptosis in these cells and improved the antitumor effect of 5-FU in tumor-bearing mice. MCS-induced apoptosis was mediated by an increase in intracellular Cu2+ ions and reactive oxygen species, along with the concurrent transcriptional enhancement of pro-apoptotic genes by p53. Furthermore, MCS induced apoptosis in MDA-MB-231 cells that had developed resistance to 5-FU and inhibited tumor growth in tumor-bearing mice with reduced 5-FU sensitivity. These findings suggest that an approach involving MCS could serve as a foundation for developing breast cancer treatment strategies to overcome p53 mutations.

Keywords: 5-fluorouracil; MDA-MB-231 cells; apoptosis; breast cancer; cell death; chemoresistance; flow cytometry; microcurrent; p53; reactive oxygen species (ROS).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
MCS improves resistance to 5-FU in cells and enhances antitumor effects in MDA-MB-231 cells.A, cell viability of MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and MDA-MB-468 cells exposed to 5-FU. Cells were treated with 5-FU at concentrations ranging from 0 to 1000 μM for 72 h. The right panel shows the IC50 values for each cell line, with the 5-FU untreated group set at 1.0. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 4). B, protein levels of p53 and phosphorylated p53 (p-p53) after treatment with 5-FU at concentrations ranging from 0 to 100 μM for 48 h in MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and MDA-MB-468 cells. The value of the 5-FU untreated group is set at 1.0. The uncropped image of p53 and p-p53 proteins in the cells is illustrated in Figure S13A. C, mRNA levels of p53 target pro-apoptotic genes BAX, NOXA, and PUMA after treatment with 5-FU at a concentration of 10 μM for 48 h in MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and MDA-MB-468 cells. The value of the 5-FU untreated group is set at 1.0. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 3). ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01 (ANOVA with a Tukey–Kramer post hoc test). D, schematic experimental procedure for treating breast cancer transplanted mice with 5-FU alone for 2 weeks 5-FU (20 mg/kg/mouse) was administered intraperitoneally to tumor-bearing mice three times a week. The image of the nude mouse is from TogoTV (©2016 DBCLS TogoTV, CC-BY-4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.ja). E, influence of 5-FU treatment on tumor growth rate in MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and MDA-MB-468-transplanted mice. All breast cancer cells were subcutaneously inoculated into the fat pads of mice. Tumor volume of day 0 is set at 1.0. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 6–8). ∗∗p < 0.01 indicates significant differences between the groups (F11,78 = 13.527, p < 0.001 for 4T1; F11,72 = 3.833, p < 0.001 for MCF-7; F11,66 = 11.73, p < 0.001; ANOVA with a Tukey–Kramer post hoc test). F, schematic of the experimental procedure for treating MDA-MB-231 transplanted mice with a combination of MCS and 5-FU for 2 weeks 5-FU (20 mg/kg/mouse) was administered intraperitoneally to tumor-bearing mice three times a week. MCS treatment was performed after 5-FU administration. G, influence of combined MCS and 5-FU treatment on tumor growth rate in MDA-MB-231-transplanted mice. (Saline: n = 8, Saline + MCS: n = 6, 5-FU: n = 8, 5-FU + MCS: n = 8). MDA-MB-231 cells were subcutaneously inoculated into the fat pads of mice. Tumor volume of day 0 is set at 1.0. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 6–8). ∗∗p < 0.01 and ∗p < 0.05 indicate significant differences between the groups (F23,156 = 4.514, p < 0.001; ANOVA with a Tukey–Kramer post hoc test). H, immunohistochemical staining of Ki-67 in MDA-MB-231 tumors. Ki-67 signals were visualized using 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (brown), and nuclei were stained with hematoxylin (blue). Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 5, 6). ∗p < 0.05 indicates a significant difference between the groups (F3,19 = 4.735, p = 0.012; ANOVA with a Tukey–Kramer post hoc test).
Figure 2
Figure 2
MCS induces apoptosis via activation of mutant p53 in MDA-MB-231 cells.A, effect of MCS treatment on MCF-10A and MDA-MB-231 cell viability. Cell viability was assessed 48 h after MCS treatment. The value of the non-MCS-treated group was set at 1.0. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 4). ∗∗p < 0.01 indicates significant differences between two groups (t6 = 9.157 for MDA-MB-231; t6 = 10.092 for MDA-MB-468; Student’s t test). B, the protein levels of p53 and p-p53 in MCF-10A and MDA-MB-231 cells. The value of the non-MCS-treated group is set at 1.0. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 4). ∗∗p < 0.01 indicates a significant difference between the two groups (t6 = 4.098 for p-p53; Student’s t test). C, effect of MCS treatment on the intracellular concentrations of metal ions in MCF-10A and MDA-MB-231 cells. The value of non-MCS-treated group is set at 1.0. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 3–6). ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01 indicate significant differences from each control (MCF-10A: Intracellular; t10 = 3.323 for Ca; t10 = 4.374 for Fe; t10 = 3.192 for Cu. MDA-MB-231: Intracellular; t7 = 6.157 for Na; t7 = 3.429 for K; t7 = 6.250 for Mg; t7 = 3.726 for Ca; t7 = 9.594 for Mn; t7 = 10.317 for Fe; t7 = 9.197 for Cu; Student’s t test). D, influence of the metal chelator EDTA (1 mM) on the MCS-induced upregulation of intracellular metal ions in MDA-MB-231 cells. The value of non-MCS-treated group is set at 1.0.Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 4). ∗p < 0.05 indicates a significant difference between the two groups (t6 = 3.623 for Fe; Student’s t test). E, influence of Cu2+ addition to the culture medium on the inhibition of MCS-induced cell proliferation in MDA-MB-231 cells. Cell viability was assessed 48 h after MCS treatment in the presence of CuCl2, with the non-MCS-treated group set at a value of 1.0. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 3). ∗∗p < 0.01 indicates significant differences between the two groups (F4,10 = 73.535, p < 0.001; ANOVA with a Tukey–Kramer post hoc test). F, influence of Cu2+ (25 μM) addition to the culture medium on the protein levels of p-p53 in MDA-MB-231 cells. The non-MCS-treated without Cu2+ addition group is set at a value of 1.0. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 3–4). ∗∗p < 0.01 indicates a significant difference between the groups (F3,12 = 23.885, p < 0.001 for p-p53; ANOVA with a Tukey–Kramer post hoc test). G, the intracellular ROS levels in MDA-MB-231 cells at 30 min after MCS. The value of the non-MCS-treated group is set at 1.0. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 3). ∗p < 0.05 indicates a significant difference between the two groups (t4 = 3.449; Student’s t test). H, influence of N-acetylcysteine (NAC; 5 mM) on the protein levels of p53 and p-p53 in MDA-MB-231 cells. The non-MCS-treated without NAC is set to a value of 1.0. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 3–4). ∗∗p < 0.01 indicates a significant difference between the groups (F3,10 = 41.657, p < 0.001 for p-p53; ANOVA with a Tukey–Kramer post hoc test). I, influence of NAC (5 mM) on MCS-induced inhibition of cell proliferation. Cell viability was assessed 48 h after MCS treatment in the presence of NAC. The non-MCS-treated without NAC is set to a value of 1.0. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 3). ∗∗p < 0.01 indicates a significant difference between the two groups (F3,8 = 72.645, p < 0.001; ANOVA with a Tukey–Kramer post hoc test). J, effect of MCS treatment on MDA-MB-468 cell viability. Cell viability was assessed 48 h after MCS treatment. The value of the non-MCS-treated group was set at 1.0. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 6). ∗∗p < 0.01 indicates significant differences between the two groups (t6 = 10.092; Student’s t test). K, the intracellular ROS levels in MDA-MB-468 cells at 30 min after MCS. The value of the non-MCS-treated group is set at 1.0. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 3). ∗p < 0.05 indicates a significant difference between the two groups (t4 = 3.904; Student’s t test). L, the protein levels of p53 and p-p53 in MDA-MB-468 cells. The value of the non-MCS-treated group is set at 1.0. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 4). ∗∗p < 0.01 and ∗p < 0.05 indicate significant differences between the two groups (t6 = 2.548 for p53; t6 = 5.161 for p-p53; Student’s t test).
Figure 3
Figure 3
MCS enhances apoptosis induction by 5-FU in MDA-MB-231 cells.A, functional analysis of genes overlapping in two datasets: (1) differential expression between non-MCS-treated and MCS-treated MDA-MB-231 cells, and (2) ChIP-seq data (Antigen: p53, Cell line: MDA-MB-231, criteria: Binding score ≥50) using the gene Ontology Resource in the DAVID system. B, C, mRNA levels of p53 target pro-apoptotic genes BAX, NOXA, and PUMA in MCF-10A and MDA-MB-231 cells at 24 h after MCS. The value of the non-MCS-treated group is set at 1.0. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 3–4). ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01 indicate significant differences between the two groups (t5 = 4.825 for BAX; t5 = 9.861 for NOXA; t5 = 3.554 for PUMA; Student’s t test). D, flow cytometry analysis of annexin V in MCF-10A and MDA-MB-231 cells at 24 h after MCS. The right panel shows the difference in the ratio of Annexin-FITC+/PI- (early apoptosis) to Annexin-FITC+/PI+ (late apoptosis) cell populations between non-MCS-treated and MCS-treated breast cell lines. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 3–4). ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01 indicate significant differences from each control group (t5 = 3.036 for late apoptosis in MCF-10A; t4 = 20.776 for early apoptosis in MDA-MB-231; t4 = 34.180 for late apoptosis in MDA-MB-231; Student’s t test). E, caspase-3/7 activity in MDA-MB-231 cells at 24 h after MCS. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 3). The value of the non-MCS-treated group is set at 1.0. ∗∗p < 0.01 indicates a significant difference between the two groups (t4 = 5.728; Student’s t test). F, schematic representation of the human BAX, NOXA, and PUMA genes. The numbers indicate the distance from the transcription start site (+1). Black rectangles represent p53 binding sites. G, ChIP analysis of MCS-induced changes in the binding amount of p53 protein to the upstream regions of BAX, NOXA, and PUMA genes in MDA-MB-231 cells. The value of the non-MCS-treated group is set at 1.0. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 4). ∗∗p < 0.01 indicates significant differences between the two groups (t6 = 71.814 for BAX; t6 = 19.936 for NOXA; t6 = 12.871 for PUMA; Student’s t test). H, the promoter activities of the BAX luciferase reporter in MDA-MB-231 cells at 24 h after MCS. The value of the non-MCS-treated group is set at 1.0.Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 3). ∗∗p < 0.01 indicates a significant difference between the two groups (F5,12 = 17.8, p < 0.001; ANOVA with a Tukey–Kramer post hoc test). I, effect of p53 knockdown on MCS-induced upregulation of BAX luciferase reporter activity in MDA-MB-231 cells. The expression of the p53 protein in the cells is illustrated in Figure S13B. The value of the non-MCS-treated group is set at 1.0. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 3). ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01 indicate significant differences between the groups (F3,8 = 16.7, p = 0.0008; ANOVA with a Tukey–Kramer post hoc test). J, effect of p53 knockdown on MCS-induced pro-apoptotic gene transcription in MDA-MB-231 cells. The value of the sh-Control non-MCS-treated group is set at 1.0. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 4). ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01 indicate significant differences between the groups (F3,12 = 5.595, p = 0.0123 for BAX; F3,12 = 12.731, p = 0.0005 for NOXA; F3,12 = 6.549, p = 0.0072 for PUMA; ANOVA with a Tukey–Kramer post hoc test). K, mRNA levels of p53 target pro-apoptotic genes BAX, NOXA, and PUMA in MDA-MB-468 cells at 24 h after MCS. The value of the non-MCS-treated group is set at 1.0. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 3–4). ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01 indicate significant differences between the two groups (t5 = 4.074 for BAX; t5 = 7.383 for NOXA; t5 = 4.021 for PUMA; Student’s t test). L, effect of p53 knockdown on MCS-induced upregulation of BAX luciferase reporter activity in MDA-MB-468 cells. The expression of the p53 protein in the cells is illustrated in Figure S13C. The value of the non-MCS-treated group is set at 1.0. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 3).∗∗p < 0.01 indicates significant differences between the groups (F3,8 = 25.975, p = 0.0002; ANOVA with a Tukey–Kramer post hoc test). M, effect of p53 knockdown on MCS-induced pro-apoptotic gene transcription in MDA-MB-468 cells. The value of the sh-Control non-MCS-treated group is set at 1.0. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 3–4). ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01 indicate significant differences between the groups (F3,12 = 19.236, p < 0.001 for BAX; F3,12 = 20.162, p < 0.001 for NOXA; F3,11 = 3.941, p = 0.0392 for PUMA; ANOVA with a Tukey–Kramer post hoc test).
Figure 4
Figure 4
MCS promotes metal ion influx and activates p53 in MDA-MB-231 cells.A, protein levels of p53, phosphorylated p53 (p-p53), and relative p53 phosphorylation levels in MDA-MB-231 cells treated with MCS and 5-FU (10 μM). The value of the non-MCS-treated without 5-FU treatment group is set at 1.0. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 4). ∗∗p < 0.01 indicates a significant difference between the groups (F3,12 = 25.011, p < 0.001 for p-p53; F3,12 = 20.812, p < 0.001 for p-p53/p53; ANOVA with a Tukey–Kramer post hoc test). B, mRNA levels of p53 target genes BAX, NOXA, and PUMA in MDA-MB-231 cells treated with MCS and 5-FU (10 μM). The value of the non-MCS-treated without 5-FU treatment group is set at 1.0. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 4). ∗∗p < 0.01 indicates a significant difference between the groups (F3,12 = 34.207, p < 0.001 for BAX; F3,12 = 17.404, p < 0.001 for NOXA; F3,12 = 13.322 for PUMA; ANOVA with a Tukey–Kramer post hoc test). C, influence of MCS on 5-FU-induced apoptosis in MDA-MB-231 cells. Top panels show the flow cytometry analysis of annexin V in non-MCS-treated or MCS-treated MDA-MB-231 cells in the presence or absence of 5-FU. The panel shows the difference in the ratio of FITC+/PI- (early apoptosis) to FITC+/PI+ (late apoptosis) cell populations between non-MCS-treated or MCS-treated MDA-MB-231 cells in the presence or absence of 5-FU. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 3). ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01 indicate a significant difference between the groups (F5,12 = 79.575, p < 0.001 for early apoptosis; F5,12 = 27.343, p < 0.001 for late apoptosis; two-way ANOVA with the Tukey–Kramer post hoc test). D, caspase activity of MDA-MB-231 cells treated with 5-FU and MCS. The value of the non-MCS-treated without 5-FU treatment group is set at 1.0. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 3).∗∗p < 0.01 indicates a significant difference between the groups (F5,12 = 62.821, p < 0.001; ANOVA with the Tukey–Kramer post hoc test). p < 0.05 indicates a significant difference from the MCS-treated 5-FU 0 μM group (F2,6 = 5.952, p < 0.0376; ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test). E, influence of MCS on 5-FU-induced apoptosis in MDA-MB-231 tumors. The right panel shows the difference in the ratio of Annexin-FITC+/PI- (early apoptosis) to Annexin-FITC+/PI+ (late apoptosis) cell populations in MDA-MB-231 tumors from each group. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 6). ∗p < 0.05 indicates a significant difference from the saline group (F3,20 = 4.590, p = 0.0133; ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Combination of MCS and 5-FU shows a high antitumor effect against 5-FU-resistant cells.A, Cell viability of parental and 5-FU-resistant MDA-MB-231 cells exposed to 5-FU. Cells were treated with 5-FU at concentrations ranging from 0 to 10000 μM for 72 h. The value for each 5-FU-untreated group is set at 1.0. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 4). B, protein levels of p53 and phosphorylated p53 (p-p53) following treatment with 5-FU at concentrations ranging from 0 to 100 μM for 48 h. The uncropped image of p53 and p-p53 proteins in the cells is illustrated in Figure S13D. C, Effect of MCS treatment on cell viability in 5-FU-resistant MDA-MB-231 cells. The value for the non-MCS group is set at 1.0. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 4). D, mRNA levels of p53 target pro-apoptotic genes BAX, NOXA, and PUMA in non-MCS-treated or MCS-treated 5-FU-resistant MDA-MB-231 cells. The value for the non-MCS group is set at 1.0. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 4). ∗p < 0.05 indicates significant differences between the two groups (t6 = 5.535 for BAX; t6 = 7.074 for PUMA; Student’s t test). E, protein levels of p53, phosphorylated p53 (p-p53), and relative p53 phosphorylation levels in 5-FU-resistant MDA-MB-231 cells. The value for the non-MCS group is set at 1.0. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 4). ∗∗p < 0.01 indicates a significant difference between the two groups (t6 = 3.416 for phosphorylated p53; t6 = 3.616 for relative p53 phosphorylation; Student’s t test). F, influence of MCS on apoptosis in 5-FU-resistant MDA-MB-231 cells. The left panels show flow cytometry analysis of annexin V in non-MCS-treated or MCS-treated 5-FU-resistant MDA-MB-231 cells. The right panel illustrates the difference in the ratio of FITC+/PI- (early apoptosis) to FITC+/PI+ (late apoptosis) cell populations between non-MCS-treated or MCS-treated 5-FU-resistant MDA-MB-231 cells. The value for the non-MCS group is set at 1.0. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 4). ∗∗p < 0.01 indicates a significant difference between the groups (t6 = 4.09 for late apoptosis; Student’s t test). G, caspase activity of parental and 5-FU-resistant MDA-MB-231 cells treated with 5-FU and MCS. The value of the non-MCS-treated without 5-FU treatment group is set at 1.0. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 3). ∗∗p < 0.01 indicates a significant difference between the groups (F5,12 = 85.151, p < 0.001; ANOVA with the Tukey–Kramer post hoc test). ††p < 0.01 indicates a significant difference from the MCS-treated 5-FU 0 μM group (F2,6 = 18.866, p < 0.0026; ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test). H, schematic representation of the experimental procedure for treating MDA-MB-231 transplanted mice with 5-FU alone for 2 weeks, followed by a combination of MCS and 5-FU for an additional 2 weeks 5-FU (20 mg/kg/mouse) was intraperitoneally administered to tumor-bearing mice three times a week. MCS treatment was performed after 5-FU administration. I, influence of combined MCS and 5-FU treatment on the tumor growth rate in MDA-MB-231-transplanted mice. Tumor volume at the start of the MCS treatment is set at 1.0. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 6–7). ∗∗p < 0.01 indicates significant differences between the groups (F11,66 = 33.965, p < 0.001; ANOVA with a Tukey–Kramer post hoc test). J, tumor weight of MDA-MB-231 tumors treated with a combination of 5-FU and MCS for 2 weeks. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 6–7). ∗∗p < 0.01 indicates a significant difference between the two groups (t11 = 3.476; Student’s t test). K, tumor long diameter of MDA-MB-231 tumors treated with a combination of 5-FU and MCS for 2 weeks. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 4–7). ∗∗p < 0.01 indicates a significant difference between the two groups (t11 = 4.433; Student’s t test).

Similar articles

References

    1. Albain K.S., Barlow W.E., Shak S., Hortobagyi G.N., Livingston R.B., Yeh I.T., et al. Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:55–65. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martin M., Pienkowski T., Mackey J., Pawlicki M., Guastalla J.P., Weaver C., et al. Adjuvant docetaxel for node-positive breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;352:2302–2313. - PubMed
    1. Longley D.B., Harkin D.P., Johnston P.G. 5-fluorouracil: mechanisms of action and clinical strategies. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2003;3:330–338. - PubMed
    1. Hafner A., Bulyk M.L., Jambhekar A., Lahav G. The multiple mechanisms that regulate p53 activity and cell fate. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019;20:199–210. - PubMed
    1. Ju J., Schmitz J.C., Song B., Kudo K., Chu E. Regulation of p53 expression in response to 5-fluorouracil in human cancer RKO cells. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007;13:4245–4251. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources