Cutaneous pharmacokinetics of a volatile drug post-application to the skin
- PMID: 40571824
- DOI: 10.1007/s13346-025-01907-8
Cutaneous pharmacokinetics of a volatile drug post-application to the skin
Abstract
This research explored whether in vitro release and skin permeation tests, combined with in vitro and in vivo stratum corneum (SC) sampling, can quantify the "input rate" of a volatile drug into and through the skin. Two topical methyl salicylate (MeSA) products were studied. Drug release from the formulations across a silicone membrane was similar, with ~ 65% of the drug load being released in 6 h. In vitro porcine skin permeation tests showed that ~ 50% of the dose crossed the skin in 24 h from both products. In SC sampling experiments, the mass of MeSA in the SC at one 'uptake' and three 'clearance' time points was measured in vitro and in vivo (in humans). The MeSA quantity taken up into the SC in vitro was > 10-fold higher than that in vivo. The first-order rate constants describing clearance from the SC were calculated and found to be similar, in vitro and in vivo, for both formulations. Mass balance revealed that about one-third of the applied drug may have been lost by evaporation in vitro from the skin surface during 2 h of clearance. The results show that the cutaneous pharmacokinetics of MeSA are proportional to the amount of drug in the two formulations and that the complementary use of in vitro release and skin penetration tests with the SC sampling technique are valid tools with which to assess topical products containing volatile drugs.
Keywords: Cutaneous pharmacokinetics; Methyl salicylate; Tape stripping; Topical bioavailability; Volatile drug.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethical approval: All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of theresponsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 [5]. The protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Approval Committee for Health at the University of Bath (REACH EP 18/19 061). Informed written consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Consent for publication: All authors have approved submission of this work and publication. Competing interests: The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Similar articles
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 12065068
-
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11701099
-
Antiretrovirals for reducing the risk of mother-to-child transmission of HIV infection.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jul 6;(7):CD003510. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003510.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. PMID: 21735394
-
Inhaled mannitol for cystic fibrosis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 9;2(2):CD008649. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008649.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 1;5:CD008649. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008649.pub4. PMID: 29424930 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280. Health Technol Assess. 2008. PMID: 18547499
References
-
- Rabindranathnambi A, Abid M. Topical treatments in dermatology. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2021. https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2020.0567 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- FDA. Code of Federal Regulations. 2018. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2024-title21-vol5/pdf/CFR-2024-t... . Accessed 14 March 2025.
-
- Raney SG, Ghosh P, Ramezanli T, Lehman PA, Franz TJ. Cutaneous pharmacokinetic approaches to compare bioavailability and/or bioequivalence for topical drug products. Dermatol Clin. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.det.2022.02.007 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Miranda M, Sousa JJ, Veiga F, Cardoso C, Vitorino C. Bioequivalence of topical generic products. Part 1: where are we now? Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2018.07.050 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Raney SG, Franz TJ, Lehman PA, Lionberger R, Chen ML. Pharmacokinetics-Based approaches for bioequivalence evaluation of topical dermatological drug products. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-015-0292-0 . - DOI - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources