Safety and Real-World Effectiveness in the Transition from Alteplase to Tenecteplase for Stroke Treatment

Abstract

Background: Tenecteplase has been shown to be non-inferior to alteplase for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours of stroke onset. While not formally approved by regulatory authorities, many jurisdictions have transitioned to using tenecteplase for routine stroke treatment because it is simpler to use and has cost advantages.

Methods: We report a three-phase time-series analysis over 2.5 years and the process for transition from use of alteplase to tenecteplase for the routine treatment of acute ischemic stroke from a system-wide perspective involving an entire province. The transition was planned and implemented centrally. Data were collected in clinical routine, arising from both administrative sources and a prospective stroke registry, and represent real-world outcome data. Data are reported using standard descriptive statistics.

Results: A total of 1211 patients were treated with intravenous thrombolysis (477 pre-transition using alteplase, 180 transition period using both drugs, 554 post-transition using tenecteplase). Baseline characteristics, adverse events and outcomes were similar between epochs. There were four dosing errors with tenecteplase, including providing the cardiac dose to two patients. There were no instances of major hemorrhage associated with dosing errors.

Discussion: The transition to using intravenous tenecteplase for stroke treatment was seamless and resulted in identical outcomes to intravenous alteplase.

Keywords: acute ischemic stroke; alteplase; intravenous thrombolytic treatment; real-world evidence; tenecteplase.