Interhospital variation in the management of Brief Resolved Unexplained Events (BRUE) in infants: A Canadian multicenter cohort study
- PMID: 40571996
- DOI: 10.1002/jhm.70094
Interhospital variation in the management of Brief Resolved Unexplained Events (BRUE) in infants: A Canadian multicenter cohort study
Abstract
Background: Guidelines on Brief Resolved Unexplained Event (BRUE) only provide recommendations for infants categorized at lower risk. However, most infants fall into the higher-risk category, leaving management decisions to individual clinicians and contributing to variation in care.
Objectives: Describe interhospital variation in BRUE management and determine whether higher resource utilization improves detection of serious underlying diagnoses.
Methods: This multicenter observational cohort (2017-2021) included infants (< 12 months) with BRUE at eight Canadian hospitals. We recorded admission, and use of electrocardiograms (ECG), electroencephalograms (EEG), antibiotic and anti-reflux medications, and subspecialty consultations. Multivariable median regression evaluated the association between tests/interventions and length of stay (LOS), and logistic regression assessed whether site-level resource use correlated with serious underlying diagnoses detection.
Results: Of 758 infants (92% higher-risk), we noted variation in admission rates (32%-76%, p < .001), ICU admissions (0%-20%, p < .001), median LOS (0.8-2.0 days, p < .001), ECG (24%-78%, p < .001), EEG (8%-29%, p = .001), and anti-reflux medication (0%-21%, p < .001). Five percent had a serious underlying diagnosis, with no significant site differences (0%-8%, p = .49). Median regression showed EEG (19.9 h, 95% CI: 6.8-33.0, p = .03), empiric antibiotics (15.8 h, 95% CI: 4.7-26.9, p = .03), and subspecialty consultation (17.0 h, 95% CI: 10.8-23.2, p < .001) were associated with longer LOS. Higher resource use did not increase detection of serious underlying diagnoses.
Conclusions: Substantial variation exists in BRUE management, associated with prolonged LOS. Higher admission and testing were not associated with increased detection of serious underlying diagnoses. These findings highlight the need for standardized care approaches.
© 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Hospital Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Hospital Medicine.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Nama N, DeLaroche A, Bonkowsky JL, Gremse D, Tieder JS. Brief resolved unexplained event: evidence‐based and family‐centered management. Pediatr Rev. 2024;45(10):560‐572. doi:10.1542/pir.2024-006351
-
- DeLaroche AM, Nama N, Tieder JS. Acute care management of brief resolved unexplained events. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2025;41(3):245‐250. doi:10.1097/pec.0000000000003277
-
- Tieder JS, Bonkowsky JL, Etzel RA, et al. Brief resolved unexplained events (formerly apparent life‐threatening events) and evaluation of lower‐risk infants. Pediatrics. 2016;137(5):e20160590. doi:10.1542/peds.2016-0590
-
- Tieder JS, Altman RL, Bonkowsky JL, et al. Management of apparent life‐threatening events in infants: a systematic review. J Pediatr. 2013;163(1):94‐99.e6. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.12.086
-
- Nama N, Shen Y, Bone JN, et al. External validation of brief resolved unexplained events prediction rules for serious underlying diagnosis. JAMA Pediatr. 2024;179(2):188‐196. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.4399
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
