Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 30;13(6):1276.
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13061276.

High Diversity and Low Coinfections of Pathogens in Ticks from Ruminants in Pakistan

Affiliations

High Diversity and Low Coinfections of Pathogens in Ticks from Ruminants in Pakistan

Laila Jamil et al. Microorganisms. .

Abstract

Emerging tick-borne infections pose growing public health threats, causing global disease burdens and economic losses. In this study, tick-borne pathogens were detected in ticks collected from ruminants in 19 sites of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province, Pakistan, between 2023 and 2024. A total of 989 ticks, belonging to five species, i.e., Hyalomma marginatum, Rhipicephalus microplus, Rhipicephalus sanguineus, Rhipicephalus haemaphysaloides, and Haemaphysalis bispinosa, were tested by specific PCR followed by Sanger sequencing. In total, fourteen pathogens including two Anaplasma species, three Ehrlichia species, three Rickettsia species, one Babesia species, and five Theileria species were identified, with an overall infection rate of 20.2% (95% CI: 17.7-22.7%). Phylogenetic analyses revealed two undefined Ehrlichia species: Candidatus Ehrlichia hyalommae was exclusively detected in Hy. marginatum ticks, while Candidatus Ehrlichia rhipicephalis was only found in R. microplus. Additionally, an undefined Rickettsia, provisionally named Candidatus Rickettsia pakistanensis, was identified, which is phylogenetically close to R. sibirica in North Asia and R. africae in Africa, suggesting its potential pathogenicity to humans. Although coinfections of two pathogens were observed, the coinfection rates were quite low. The findings revealed a significant diversity of tick-borne pathogens in Pakistani ticks, which may pose risks to livestock and humans.

Keywords: Anaplasma; Babesia; Ehrlichia; Pakistan; Rickettsia; Theileria; high diversity; phylogenetic analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 2
Figure 2
Phylogenetic trees of Anaplasma were constructed using the maximum likelihood (ML) method with 1000 bootstrap replicates based on (A) 16S rRNA, (B) gltA, and (C) groEL genes. The evolutionary positions of samples that tested positive for at least two of the three gene fragments are highlighted in red text.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Phylogenetic trees of Ehrlichia were constructed using the maximum likelihood (ML) method with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Separate trees were generated for (A) 16S rRNA and (B) groEL genes. (C) A concatenated tree was built based on 16S rRNA and groEL nucleotide sequences. The evolutionary positions of samples that tested positive for all two gene fragments are highlighted in red text.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Phylogenetic trees of Rickettsia were constructed using the maximum likelihood (ML) method with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Separate trees were generated for (A) OmpA, (B) 17 kDa, and (C) gltA genes. (D) A concatenated tree was built based on OmpA, 17 kDa, and gltA nucleotide sequences. The evolutionary positions of samples that tested positive for at least two of the three gene fragments are highlighted in red text.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Phylogenetic trees of Theileria and Babesia strains based on their 18S rRNA gene sequences. Sequences obtained in this study are highlighted in red text.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of tick samples in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province, Pakistan. The red stars indicated in the diagram designate 19 specific sampling sites located across three districts within the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province of Pakistan.

Similar articles

References

    1. Nasirian H. Hard tick species parasitism levels in domestic ruminants with their distribution and role as vectors: A detailed global meta-analysis and systematic review. Acta Parasitol. 2023;69:1–105. doi: 10.1007/s11686-023-00724-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Paules C.I., Marston H.D., Bloom M.E., Fauci A.S. Tickborne diseases—Confronting a growing threat. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018;379:701–703. - PubMed
    1. Rochlin I., Toledo A. Emerging tick-borne pathogens of public health importance: A mini-review. J. Med. Microbiol. 2020;69:781–791. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001206. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rahman A., Kashif M., Nasir A., Idress A., Jamil M., Qadir Z.A., Qasim M., Khan I., Aziz H., Qazi I., et al. A review of tick and tick control strategies in Pakistan. Pak. J. Med. Health Sci. 2022;16:652–655. doi: 10.53350/pjmhs22161652. - DOI
    1. Mushtaq A., Shoukat T., Mumtaz T., Qasim M., Ajmal K., Fatima N., Khan A., Kouser M., Hussain N., Khan S.S., et al. Tick-borne diseases in sheep and goats in Pakistan: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Parasitol. 2021;66:1316–1325. doi: 10.1007/s11686-021-00396-2. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources