The Role of Chemical Modifications in the Genome of Negative-Sense RNA Viruses on the Innate Immune Response
- PMID: 40573386
- PMCID: PMC12197367
- DOI: 10.3390/v17060795
The Role of Chemical Modifications in the Genome of Negative-Sense RNA Viruses on the Innate Immune Response
Abstract
Negative-sense RNA viruses comprise a wide array of viral families, such as Orthomyxoviridae, Paramyxoviridae, Rhabdoviridae, and Morbillivirus, all of which are adept at inciting significant epidemic outbreaks. Throughout their replication cycle, these viruses engage in a variety of RNA modifications, during both the co-transcriptional and post-transcriptional phases, which are mediated by specific enzymatic activities. These chemical alterations play a critical role in shaping viral fitness, particularly in terms of evading innate immune responses. Key chemical modifications, such as adenosine methylation, 2'-O methylation of nucleosides, and adenosine-to-inosine editing, play critical roles in determining the stability, translational efficiency, and immune recognition of viral RNA. These modifications can reduce the activation of immune sensors, thereby suppressing interferon production and broader antiviral responses. In contrast, certain modifications may enhance immune recognition, which opens avenues for novel vaccine and antiviral strategy development. A comprehensive understanding of these RNA chemical modifications and their implications for virus-host interactions is essential for advancing therapeutic strategies aimed at manipulating innate immunity and optimizing the efficacy of RNA-based vaccines. This review examines the mechanisms and implications of RNA chemical modifications in negative-sense RNA viruses, emphasizing their dual roles in either evading or activating the innate immune system.
Keywords: 2′-O-methylation; N6,2′O-dimethyladenosine; N6-methyladenosine; N7-methylguanosine; RNA chemical modifications; epitranscriptomic; innate immunity; inosine; negative-polarity single-stranded RNA viruses; pseudouridine.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Nonsegmented Negative-Sense RNA Viruses Utilize N6-Methyladenosine (m6A) as a Common Strategy To Evade Host Innate Immunity.J Virol. 2021 Apr 12;95(9):e01939-20. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01939-20. Print 2021 Apr 12. J Virol. 2021. PMID: 33536170 Free PMC article.
-
RNA modifications in female reproductive physiology and disease: emerging roles and clinical implications.Hum Reprod Update. 2025 Jul 1;31(4):333-360. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmaf005. Hum Reprod Update. 2025. PMID: 40152541 Review.
-
RNA Viruses, Toll-Like Receptors, and Cytokines: The Perfect Storm?J Innate Immun. 2025;17(1):126-153. doi: 10.1159/000543608. Epub 2025 Jan 16. J Innate Immun. 2025. PMID: 39820070 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A MicroRNA Screen Identifies the Wnt Signaling Pathway as a Regulator of the Interferon Response during Flavivirus Infection.J Virol. 2017 Mar 29;91(8):e02388-16. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02388-16. Print 2017 Apr 15. J Virol. 2017. PMID: 28148804 Free PMC article.
-
Chemical Strategies to Modulate and Manipulate RNA Epigenetic Modifications.Acc Chem Res. 2025 Jun 3;58(11):1727-1741. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.4c00844. Epub 2025 Mar 18. Acc Chem Res. 2025. PMID: 40100209 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources