Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: pathological findings in the first 100 cases
- PMID: 4057406
- DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)47661-0
Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: pathological findings in the first 100 cases
Abstract
In an effort to preserve sexual function, a nerve-sparing technique for radical retropubic prostatectomy has been used in 100 consecutive men with clinically localized prostatic cancer. Each gland was submitted for total histological examination in a way that permitted determination of the extent of the tumor and adequacy of surgical margins. Although 41 patients had established tumor in periprostatic tissue only 7 had positive surgical margins: all 7 had extensive extraprostatic involvement by tumor, while 5 had involvement of the seminal vesicles and none had surgical margins positive only at the site of the nerve-sparing modification. Sexual function was evaluated in 60 of the patients who were potent preoperatively and who have been followed for a minimum of 1 year: 84 per cent of the patients with an intact prostatic capsule were potent compared to 43 per cent with extensive involvement of periprostatic tissue and 33 per cent with involvement of the seminal vesicles or pelvic lymph nodes. Based upon our findings there is no indication that the nerve-sparing modification compromises the adequacy of the removal of the cancer, which is determined primarily by the extent of the tumor rather than the operative technique. Thus, it appears possible to preserve sexual function in a majority of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy without compromising the adequacy of the cancer operation.
Similar articles
-
Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: extraprostatic tumor extension and preservation of erectile function.J Urol. 1985 Dec;134(6):1149-51. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)47662-2. J Urol. 1985. PMID: 4057407
-
Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of results after 250 patients.J Urol. 1990 Mar;143(3):538-43; discussion 544. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)40013-9. J Urol. 1990. PMID: 2304166
-
Potency following radical prostatectomy with wide unilateral excision of the neurovascular bundle.J Urol. 1987 Oct;138(4):823-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)43385-4. J Urol. 1987. PMID: 3656538
-
Radical prostatectomy, preservation of sexual function, cancer control. The controversy.Urol Clin North Am. 1987 Nov;14(4):663-73. Urol Clin North Am. 1987. PMID: 3314061 Review.
-
Current results and patient selection for nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.Semin Urol Oncol. 1995 Aug;13(3):204-14. Semin Urol Oncol. 1995. PMID: 8521134 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of retropubic, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner?World J Urol. 2018 Apr;36(4):609-621. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2174-1. Epub 2018 Jan 23. World J Urol. 2018. PMID: 29362896 Review.
-
Prostate cancer: 8. Urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction.CMAJ. 1999 Jan 12;160(1):78-86. CMAJ. 1999. PMID: 9934350 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Long-term comparative outcome analysis of a robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with retropubic radical prostatectomy by a single surgeon.J Robot Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):677-685. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01479-6. Epub 2022 Oct 28. J Robot Surg. 2023. PMID: 36306101 Review.
-
Managing localised cancer of the prostate.Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988 Mar 19;296(6625):810. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6625.810. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988. PMID: 3130924 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
"Single Knot-Single Running Suture" Vesicourethral Anastomosis with Posterior Musculofascial Reconstruction during Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Step-by-Step Guide of Surgical Technique.J Pers Med. 2023 Jun 29;13(7):1072. doi: 10.3390/jpm13071072. J Pers Med. 2023. PMID: 37511685 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical