Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 12:16:1605716.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1605716. eCollection 2025.

Immune monitoring and risk of infection in pediatric liver transplantation: a prospective study

Affiliations

Immune monitoring and risk of infection in pediatric liver transplantation: a prospective study

Ricardo Cuesta-Martín de la Cámara et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

Background: Immune monitoring has been proposed to optimize immunosuppressive therapy in liver recipients. This study aims to describe immunological changes following liver transplantation in pediatric recipients and to identify immune markers associated with post-transplant complications.

Methods: The immunological status of 95 pediatric liver recipients was prospectively assessed before transplantation and at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-transplantation. Serum immunoglobulins (Ig) were measured by nephelometry and immunophenotype was evaluated by flow cytometry. T, B and NK lymphocyte counts were adjusted for age using standard reference ranges.

Results: Graft rejection, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder and autoimmune hepatitis was diagnosed in 6%, 2% and 0% patients, respectively. Early infections affected 43% patients, while late infections occurred in 17%, 24%, 10% and 9% recipients at each follow-up interval. Baseline immune dysregulation primarily involved the cellular compartment, with 78% recipients showing lymphopenia. Lymphocyte subpopulation scores improved following liver transplantation, with CD4+ score normalizing by month 1 and CD8+, CD19+ and NK scores by month 6. First-month IgG hypogammaglobulinemia, observed in 20% recipients, resolved completely at month 12. First-month T-cell lymphopenia (CD3+ hazard ratio [HR] 2.48, p=0.005; CD8+ HR 2.38, p=0.008) and hypogammaglobulinemia (IgG HR 2.18, p=0.036; IgA HR 2.40, p=0.011; IgM HR 2.61, p=0.006) were associated with higher risk of late infections. In multivariate analysis, only CD3+ T-cell lymphopenia remained a significant predictor (HR 2.13, p=0.030).

Conclusions: Baseline immune dysregulation resolved within the first months post-transplantation. Early infections were unrelated to immune markers, while late infections were associated with CD3+ T-cell lymphopenia and hypogammaglobulinemia.

Keywords: cellular immunity; flow cytometry; humoral immunity; immune monitoring; liver transplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart for the inclusion of the pediatric liver transplanted patient cohort (n=95).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage of (A) infected pediatric liver recipients and (B) distribution of infection types (viral, bacterial, or fungal) across each follow-up period: from transplantation (Tx) to 1 month post-transplantation (1M), 1M to 3M, 3M to 6M, 6M to 9M and 9M to 12M.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Evolution of (A) immunoglobulin G (IgG), (B) IgA and (C) IgM serum levels in a cohort of pediatric liver recipients grouped by age ranges across each follow-up period: pre-transplantation (Pre-Tx) and 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-transplantation (1M, 3M, 6M, 9M and 12M, respectively).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Evolution of each lymphocyte subpopulation score in a cohort of pediatric liver recipients across each follow-up period: pre-transplantation (Pre-Tx) and 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-transplantation (1M, 3M, 6M, 9M and 12M, respectively). Studied subsets included (A) total lymphocytes, (B) CD3+ T lymphocytes, (C) CD3+CD4+ T lymphocytes, (D) CD3+CD8+ T lymphocytes, (E) CD19+ B lymphocytes and (F) CD3-CD16+CD56+ NK lymphocytes. Scores were calculated by substracting the median of the age-specific normal range from the absolute number of lymphocytes in the subpopulation. Dashed lines mark the normal range, defined as scores between -0.5 and 0.5. Horizontal lines represent statistically significant differences between the median scores of two distinct follow-up periods.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Effect of the presence of (A) T CD3+ T lymphopenia, (B) CD4+ T lymphopenia or (C) CD8+ T lymphopenia on late infection risk. Global p-values were obtained at 1 month post-transplantation by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Similar articles

References

    1. Adams DH, Sanchez-Fueyo A, Samuel D. From immunosuppression to tolerance. J Hepatol. (2015) 62:S170–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.02.042 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adam R, Karam V, Delvart V, O’Grady J, Mirza D, Klempnauer J, et al. Evolution of indications and results of liver transplantation in Europe. A report from the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR). J Hepatol. (2012) 57:675–88. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.04.015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ghelichi-Ghojogh M, Rajabi A, Mohammadizadeh F, Shojaie L, Vali M, Afrashteh S, et al. Survival Rate of Liver Transplantation in Asia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Iran J Public Health. (2022) 51:2207–20. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v51i10.10979 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jain A, Mazariegos G, Kashyap R, Kosmach-Park B, Starzl TE, Fung J, et al. Pediatric liver transplantation: A Single Center Experience Spanning 20 Years1. Transplantation. (2002) 73:941–7. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200203270-00020 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jara P, Hierro L. Trasplante hepático infantil. Resultados a largo plazo. Gastroenterología y Hepatología. (2010) 33:398–410. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2009.11.004 - DOI - PubMed