Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun 3:25:100997.
doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100997. eCollection 2025 Sep.

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest in single ventricle patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Tia T Raymond  1 , Anne Marie Guerguerian  2 , Javier J Lasa  3 , Michael Alice Moga  4 , Gurpreet S Dhillon  4 , Jason Acworth  5 , Dianne L Atkins  6 , Barnaby R Scholefield  2 ; Paediatric Life Support Task Force for the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation ILCOR
Affiliations
Review

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest in single ventricle patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Tia T Raymond et al. Resusc Plus. .

Abstract

Objectives: Assess the use of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), compared with manual/mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), for in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) in pediatric patients with single ventricle (SV) congenital heart disease (CHD).

Methods: PRISMA guidelines were followed with PROSPERO registration (CRD42023479671). We searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library for studies published before January 23, 2025. The population included pediatric patients (<18 years old) with IHCA. Two investigators reviewed studies for relevance, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the ROBINS-I tool. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE framework. Outcomes included short-term and long-term survival and favorable neurological outcome.

Results: We identified 20 studies: 15 described ECPR in SV patients without a comparator group, and 5 compared SV ECPR patients vs. SV extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) without ECPR (ECMO non-ECPR). Pooled synthesis for survival to hospital discharge was analyzed in 3 observational studies with 91 SV patients (pooled OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.37-1.01) and separately in 2 registry studies with 968 SV patients (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.35-1.37 and OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.78-1.41) with very low certainty of evidence (downgraded for risk of bias and imprecision). These studies found no significant difference in survival to hospital discharge in ECPR compared to ECMO non-ECPR in pediatric SV patients. No studies were identified that compared pediatric SV patients who received ECPR vs. conventional/manual CPR.

Conclusions: There is no direct evidence to either support or refute the use of ECPR during IHCA in pediatric patients with SV CHD, and there is inconclusive evidence to either support or refute the use of ECPR compared to ECMO non-ECPR. Additional research is needed to address the use of ECPR in this specific cardiac population.

Keywords: Cardiac arrest; Children; ECPR; Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Single ventricle.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: “This work was conducted through volunteer support from the International Liaison Committee On Resuscitation (ILCOR) who receives funding from the American Heart Association. The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Collaborator MK, KCN, and AT are Editorial Board members of Resuscitation Plus”.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow chart.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot for pooled adjusted odds ratio for survival to hospital discharge using mixed effect modeling.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Conrad S.A., Broman L.M., Taccone F.S., et al. The extracorporeal life support organization Maastricht treaty for nomenclature in extracorporeal life support. A position paper of the Extracorporeal life support organization. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;198:447–451. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201710-2130CP. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barbaro R.P., Paden M.L., Guner Y.S., et al. Pediatric extracorporeal life support organization registry international report 2016. ASAIO J. 2017;63:456–463. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000603. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Esangbedo I.D., Brunetti M.A., Campbell F.M., Lasa J.J. Pediatric extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020;21:e934–e943. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002373. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guerguerian A.M., Sano M., Todd M., Honjo O., Alexander P., Raman L. Pediatric extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation ELSO guidelines. ASAIO J. 2021;67:229–237. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001345. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Matos R.I., Watson R.S., Nadkarni V.M., et al. Duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and illness category impact survival and neurologic outcomes for in-hospital pediatric cardiac arrests. Circulation. 2013;127:442–451. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.125625. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources