Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 11:7:1588414.
doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1588414. eCollection 2025.

Morphology of male world cup and elite bouldering athletes

Affiliations

Morphology of male world cup and elite bouldering athletes

Pawel Draga et al. Front Sports Act Living. .

Abstract

Aims: To compare the somatic characteristics and somatotypes of elite bouldering athletes competing in World Cups and World Championships with national-level climbers and general adult population norms, and to identify anthropometric characteristics that differentiate performance levels in competitive climbing and distinguish climbers from the general adult population.

Materials and methods: Anthropometric data were measured according to the ISAK protocol and somatotype was determined using the Heath-Carter method. Tissue composition and body proportions were examined using measurements of skinfolds, circumferences, widths and indices such as Ape Index and Arm Index. Thirty-four men participated in the study: 9 IFSC-ranked international level athletes and 25 national athletes. Statistical analysis used the Shapiro-Wilk test to assess the normality of the distribution, the Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test to compare groups, LASSO regression to identify significant characteristics and Spearman's correlation coefficient to examine correlations between variables.

Results: International climbers demonstrated a significantly lower body fat percentage ( 14.4 ± 2.00 % ) compared to national athletes ( 17.56 ± 2.16 % ) and the general adult population ( 18.4 ± 2.9 % ) . Thinner skinfolds and smaller thigh and arm girths were found among the higher level climbers. Body proportions were more favorable in international athletes, who showed higher Ape (1.06 ± 0.02) and Arm Index values (46.22 ± 1.26) compared to national-level competitors (1.03 ± 0.03 and 44.98 ± 1.45, respectively). No significant differences were observed in somatotype profiles.

Conclusions: International climbers differ from national athletes by having higher muscle mass, lower body fat, smaller limb girths, and shorter stature. The benefits of these characteristics and the influence of selection processes remain unclear. Notably, the low body fat in elite climbers likely reflects training adaptations rather than calorie restriction.

Keywords: ISAK protocol; LASSO; anthropometry; body composition; bouldering; competitive climbing; heath-carter method; somatotype.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors PD, DP, and AS were employed by the company Medical Informatics and Technology GmbH, Hall in Tirol, Austria, and author PB was employed by W.I.R. gemeinnützige GmbH, Hall in Tirol, Austria. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Differences in weight and body composition variables between international and national athletes. Bar charts are shown with standard deviations of the mean.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Differences in limb girths between international and national athletes. The bar charts are presented with the standard deviations of the means.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Differences in body length and length indices variables between international and national athletes. Bar charts are shown with standard deviations of the mean.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The scatter plots show the three most important variables identified by the optimal feature selection method. The left panel displays the relationship between fat mass and thigh girth, while the right panel illustrates the relationship between fat mass and relaxed arm girth.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Somatotypes of international athletes marked in blue.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Somatotypes of national athletes marked in yellow.

Similar articles

References

    1. Nguyen Q, Butler H, Matthews G. An examination of olympic sport climbing competition format and scoring system. J Data Sci. (2022) 20:1–12. 10.6339/22-JDS1042 - DOI
    1. Rokowski R, Michailov M, Maciejczyk M, Wiȩcek M, Szymura J, Draga P, et al. Muscle strength and endurance in high-level rock climbers. Sports Biomech. (2024) 23:1057–72. 10.1080/14763141.2021.1916577 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beltrán R, Richter J, Köstermeyer G, Heinkel U. Climbing technique evaluation by means of skeleton 324 video stream analysis. Sensors. (2023) 23:8216. 10.3390/s23198216. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mabe J, Butler S. Analysis of contemporary anaerobic sport specific training techniques for rock climbing. Sport J. (2016) 20. Available at: https://thesportjournal.org/article/analysis-of-contemporary-anaerobic-s...
    1. Mangan K, Andrews K, Miles B, Draper N. The psychology of rock climbing: a systematic review. Psychol Sport Exerc. (2025) 76:102763. 10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102763 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources