Adapting two pain assessment tools for young people with cerebral palsy: a multi-stakeholder consensus study
- PMID: 40575731
- PMCID: PMC12200239
- DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001304
Adapting two pain assessment tools for young people with cerebral palsy: a multi-stakeholder consensus study
Abstract
Introduction: Cerebral palsy (CP) is the most common cause of childhood physical disability. Chronic pain is a common comorbidity of CP; however, holistic pain assessment is challenging due to few available self-report tools for people with CP and diverse cognitive, communication, and functional abilities. Previous research has identified 2 tools for potential use in CP (Fear of Pain Questionnaire for Children-Short Form [FOPQ-C-SF] and Modified Brief Pain Inventory [mBPI]), along with potential modifications.
Objectives: To gain consensus on modifications required to the FOPQ-C-SF and mBPI for use with children and young people with CP and chronic pain.
Methods: A 2-round modified electronic Delphi study with people with lived experience (n = 19 and 16) and clinicians (n = 25 and 21) was conducted. Ethics was obtained through the Women's and Children's Health Network Human Research Ethics Committee (2022/HRE00154). A total of 37 modification suggestions to the FOPQ-C-SF and mBPI were rated on a 5-point Likert scale (strongly agree to strongly disagree). Consensus was determined as ≥75% of participants rating the suggestion as strongly agree/agree, or strongly disagree/disagree.
Results: Seven modifications reached consensus for inclusion in the FOPQ-C-SF and 21 for the mBPI. No modifications reached consensus for exclusion for either tool. Modifications primarily focused on refining wording, enhancing visual representation of the tool for improved understanding and reducing the number of response options.
Conclusion: Consensus has been reached on modifications to the FOPQ-C-SF and mBPI for young people with cerebral palsy. Future research will examine the comprehensibility of the adapted tools across the population.
Keywords: Assessment; Cerebral palsy; Chronic pain; Patient-reported outcome measures.
Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The International Association for the Study of Pain.
Conflict of interest statement
No funding or sponsorship was received for this study. The authors have stated that they had no interests that might be perceived as posing a conflict or bias.Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.
Similar articles
-
The comprehensibility and feasibility of the modified brief pain inventory and fear of pain questionnaire adapted for children and young people with cerebral palsy.Qual Life Res. 2025 Aug;34(8):2377-2392. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03981-4. Epub 2025 Apr 29. Qual Life Res. 2025. PMID: 40301159 Free PMC article.
-
Examining tools for assessing the impact of chronic pain on emotional functioning in children and young people with cerebral palsy: stakeholder preference and recommendations for modification.Qual Life Res. 2024 Aug;33(8):2247-2259. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03693-1. Epub 2024 May 25. Qual Life Res. 2024. PMID: 38795198 Free PMC article.
-
Antidepressants for chronic non-cancer pain in children and adolescents.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 5;8(8):CD012535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012535.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28779487 Free PMC article.
-
Exercise interventions for cerebral palsy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 11;6(6):CD011660. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011660.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28602046 Free PMC article.
-
Physical activity and exercise for chronic pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 24;4(4):CD011279. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011279.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28436583 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the brief pain inventory. Ann Acad Med Singap 1994;23:129–38. - PubMed
-
- Diamond IR, Grant RC, Feldman BM, Pencharz PB, Ling SC, Moore AM, Wales PW. Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2014;67:401–9. - PubMed
-
- Emmott A, West N, Zhou G, Dunsmuir D, Montgomery CJ, Lauder GR, von Baeyer CL. Validity of simplified versus standard self-report measures of pain intensity in preschool-aged children undergoing venipuncture. J Pain 2017;18:564–73. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous