Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 27.
doi: 10.1007/s42977-025-00268-0. Online ahead of print.

A BEE indicator for monitoring wild bee diversity in agricultural systems

Affiliations

A BEE indicator for monitoring wild bee diversity in agricultural systems

Marco d'Agostino et al. Biol Futur. .

Abstract

Given the growing importance of assessing the condition of wild bees in agroecosystems, we focused on developing a BEE indicator that could be easily used by non-expert taxonomists to score bee diversity. Our goal was to create a tool suitable for farm-level use, one that does not require taxonomic expertise nor heavy field work. Since existing literature has emphasized the significance of environmental features surrounding any investigated site, we incorporated this aspect into our design. We began by identifying a user-friendly field tool to differentiate among bee morphogenera, then proceeded by developing a process for data analyses and interpretation. A protocol is also shared. Further on, we run a case-study testing this tool at 13 sites in three countries, differentiating farms based on farming practices (conventional or organic, as proxy of opposite conditions). The results confirmed that (a) a diagnostic table based on morphological similarities is a practical field tool that, in almost all cases, allows for accurate classification of a bee individual into a specific group (morphogenus); (b) the process of analysis, based on number of morphogenera and landscape composition reflects variability among bees and across sites; (c) evaluating environmental features is essential for placing the results of bee variability into the appropriate context.

Keywords: Agroecosystems; Morphogenera; Natural features; SDG 12: Responsible consumption and production; SDG 15: Life on land; Wild bees.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.

Similar articles

References

    1. Albertazzi S, Monterastelli E, Giovanetti M, Zenga EL, Flaminio S, Galloni M, Quaranta M, Bortolotti L (2021) Biodiversity evaluation: from endorsed indexes to inclusion of a pollinator indicator. Diversity 13:477. https://doi.org/10.3390/d13100477 - DOI
    1. Beck HE, Zimmermann NE, McVicar TR, Vergopolan N, Berg A, Wood EF (2018) Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. Sci Data 5:180214. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.214 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Calvi G, Campedelli T, Tellini Florenzano G, Rossi P (2018) Evaluating the benefits of agri-environment schemes on farmland bird communities through a common species monitoring programme. A case study in northern Italy. Agric Syst 160:60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.09.002 - DOI
    1. Cervellini M, Zannini P, Di Musciano M, Fattorini S, Jiménez-Alfaro B, Rocchini D, Field R, Vetaas OR, Irl SD, Beierkuhnlein C (2020) A grid-based map for the biogeographical regions of Europe. Biodivers Data J 8:e53720. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e53720 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. da Coutinho JG, Garibaldi LA, Viana BF (2018) The influence of local and landscape scale on single response traits in bees: a meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 256:61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.12.025 - DOI