Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun 27.
doi: 10.1007/s00414-025-03543-w. Online ahead of print.

Autopsy findings in victims of gunshot injuries: wound ballistic considerations based on test shots to simulants and composite models

Affiliations
Review

Autopsy findings in victims of gunshot injuries: wound ballistic considerations based on test shots to simulants and composite models

Markus Große Perdekamp et al. Int J Legal Med. .

Abstract

The focus of this review is on the experimental reproduction of gunshot injuries as observed in real autopsy cases. At the centre of considerations are the morphological features and diagnostic conclusions derived from the wound appearance. With this in mind, the technical possibilities to simulate the tissue damage are described on the basis of the pertinent literature and our own studies. In particular, the following issues are addressed: (1) the morphology of bullet entrance wounds depending on the shooting distance (contact, close range and distant shots); (2) the findings along the bullet path (with special regard to different soft tissues and the fracture patterns in bones); (3) the use of biological and synthetic simulants as target material; (4) imaging techniques and evaluation methods in one-component surrogates and composite models; (5) injuries from uncommon weapons and shooting devices.

Keywords: Artificial bone; Composite model; Experimental wound ballistics; Glycerin soap; Gunshot injury; High-speed videography; Ordnance gelatine; Simulants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval: Not applicable. Research involving living human participants and/or animals: Not applicable. Informed consent: Not applicable. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Haberda A (1919) Eduard R. v. Hofmanns Lehrbuch der ge-richtlichen Medizin, 10th edn, vol 1, Urban & Schwarzenberg, Berlin Wien, pp 326–357
    1. Sellier K (1982) Schusswaffen und Schusswirkungen I. Ballistik, Medizin und Kriminalistik, Schmidt-Römhild, Lübeck, pp 200, 207–214, 249–253, 303–318
    1. Thali MJ, Kneubuehl BP, Zollinger U, Dirnhofer R (2002) A study of the morphology of gunshot entrance wounds, in connection with their dynamic creation, utilizing the ‘skin-skull-brain’ model. Forensic Sci Int 125:190–194 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Geisenberger D, Große Perdekamp M, Pollak S, Thierauf-Emberger A, Thoma V (2022) Differing sizes of bullet entrance holes in skin of the anterior and posterior trunk. Int J Legal Med 136:1597–1603 - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Pollak S (1980) Morphology of bullet entrance wounds in palms and plantae. Z Rechtsmed 86:41–47 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources