Accuracy of Breast MRI for Surgical Planning After Neoadjuvant Therapy for Patients with Invasive Lobular Carcinoma
- PMID: 40576899
- DOI: 10.1245/s10434-025-17735-6
Accuracy of Breast MRI for Surgical Planning After Neoadjuvant Therapy for Patients with Invasive Lobular Carcinoma
Abstract
Background: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the second most common subtype of breast cancer, comprising 10-15% of cases. Due to its diffuse growth pattern, conventional imaging techniques have decreased sensitivity for ILC. While breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often recommended for ILC, its accuracy following neoadjuvant therapy is unknown. We evaluated the accuracy of post-treatment MRI and examined the impact on surgical outcomes.
Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 129 patients with ILC who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or endocrine therapy (NET) and had post-treatment MRI. We considered a 0.5 cm difference between longest tumor diameter on MRI and pathologic tumor size to be discrepant. Tumor imaging phenotype was categorized as mass, non-mass enhancement (NME), or mass + NME. We evaluated concordance between imaging and pathology by tumor phenotype and associations with positive margin rates using Stata 18.0.
Results: Post-treatment MRI underestimated tumor size in 52.5% of cases, was concordant in 25.3%, and overestimated in 22.2%. The presence of NME was associated with a higher rate of tumor size underestimation (62.5% versus 39.5% for mass only, p = 0.023); mean underestimation was 3.4 cm in those with NME. Underestimation was associated with higher positive margin rates following breast-conserving surgery (p = 0.018). Finally, among patients with complete imaging response on MRI, 93.3% had residual invasive disease on pathology.
Conclusions: Following neoadjuvant therapy, post-treatment MRI frequently underestimates tumor size in ILC, particularly in tumors with NME. Surgeons should consider these imaging limitations when planning resection, which could improve surgical outcomes.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: Rita A. Mukhtar was supported by the National Cancer Institute Award K08CA256047. Amie Y. Lee receives book royalties from Elsevier. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36161421 Free PMC article.
-
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35593186 Free PMC article.
-
Magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 6;5(5):CD014798. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014798.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35521901 Free PMC article.
-
Magnetic resonance perfusion for differentiating low-grade from high-grade gliomas at first presentation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 22;1(1):CD011551. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011551.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29357120 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340. Health Technol Assess. 2006. PMID: 16959170
Cited by
-
ASO Author Reflections: Accuracy of MRI in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma after Neoadjuvant Therapy: Impact of Non-mass Enhancement.Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jul 10. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17794-9. Online ahead of print. Ann Surg Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40640479 No abstract available.
References
-
- Li CI, Uribe DJ, Daling JR. Clinical characteristics of different histologic types of breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2005;93(9):1046–52. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602787 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Corso G, Fusco N, Guerini-Rocco E, Leonardi MC, Criscitiello C, Zagami P, Nicolò E, Mazzarol G, La Vecchia C, Pesapane F, Zanzottera C, Tarantino P, Petitto S, Bianchi B, Massari G, Boato A, Sibilio A, Polizzi A, Curigliano G, De Scalzi AM, Lauria F, Bonanni B, Marabelli M, Rotili A, Nicosia L, Albini A, Calvello M, Mukhtar RA, Robson ME, Sacchini V, Rennert G, Galimberti V, Veronesi P, Magnoni F. Invasive lobular breast cancer: focus on prevention, genetics, diagnosis, and treatment. Semin Oncol. 2024;51(3–4):106–22. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminoncol.2024.05.001 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Johnson K, Sarma D, Hwang ES. Lobular breast cancer series: imaging. Breast Cancer Res. 2015;17(1):1–8. - DOI
-
- Piper ML, Wong J, Fahrner-Scott K, Ewing C, Alvarado M, Esserman LJ, Mukhtar RA. Success rates of re-excision after positive margins for invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2019;6(5):29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-019-0125-7 . - DOI
-
- Sagara Y, Barry WT, Mallory MA, Vaz-Luis I, Aydogan F, Brock JE, Winer EP, Golshan M, Metzger-Filho O. Surgical options and locoregional recurrence in patients diagnosed with invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(13):4280–6. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4570-8 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources