Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 27;20(6):e0326575.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326575. eCollection 2025.

Exploring perceptions of health literacy, healthcare access, and utilisation among higher education students in Alentejo, Southern Portugal: A qualitative study

Affiliations

Exploring perceptions of health literacy, healthcare access, and utilisation among higher education students in Alentejo, Southern Portugal: A qualitative study

Jorge Rosário et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Introduction: Health Literacy (HL), defined as the ability to access, understand, appraise and apply health information to make informed decisions, is essential for individual and public health. However, in rural regions such as Alentejo, Portugal, higher education students often encounter specific challenges that hinder the development and effective use of these skills. This study aimed to explore the perceptions of higher education students in Alentejo, Portugal, with regard to health literacy, access to and utilisation of healthcare, and to identify barriers, facilitators and interventions to inform strategies that promote equity, build student capacity and sustainably improve health outcomes.

Methodology: A qualitative, exploratory, and descriptive study was conducted using three focus groups held on 11th, 13th, and 18th December 2023, with a purposive non-probability sample of 29 participants across first-year, intermediate, and final-year levels. The participants shared their experiences, challenges, and resources related to health literacy, healthcare access, and utilisation. The focus group discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed through a systematic process of open, axial, and selective coding. Codes were organised into categories, and thematic identification was facilitated using a constant comparative method. Content analysis was conducted with MAXQDA® 22 software. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the University of Évora, Portugal, and informed consent was secured from all participants.

Results: The students' perception was that health literacy, access to and utilisation of healthcare are influenced by a dynamic interaction of barriers and facilitators. The identified barriers encompassed the presence of misinformation, financial and logistical challenges, and emotional stigma, particularly in the context of mental and sexual health. Conversely, facilitators were identified as encompassing access to digital tools, a family and peer support network, professional guidance and institutional resources such as libraries and workshops. The students recommended that interventions to improve health literacy be integrated into the higher education curriculum, that navigation support systems be improved and that structural inequalities be explored in order to improve access to and participation in healthcare.

Conclusion: Digital resources have the potential to improve access to health information; however, persistent challenges such as misinformation, financial constraints and stigma limit their impact. This study underscores the significance of specific interventions to enhance health literacy and healthcare navigation skills. These interventions include the integration of health literacy into academic curricula, the provision of specialised workshops, and the facilitation of access to healthcare services. The study identifies nursing interventions and institutional support as key strategies to promote equitable access to healthcare and improve student wellbeing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

References

    1. Sørensen K, Levin-Zamir D, Duong TV, Okan O, Brasil VV, Nutbeam D. Building health literacy system capacity: a framework for health literate systems. Health Promotion Int. 2021;36(Supplement_1):i13–23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kickbusch I, Pelikan JM, Apfel F, Tsouros AD, editors. Health literacy: the solid facts. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. 2013.
    1. Nutbeam D, Lloyd JE. Understanding and Responding to Health Literacy as a Social Determinant of Health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2021;42(1):159–73. - PubMed
    1. Pleasant A, Kuruvilla S. A tale of two health literacies: public health and clinical approaches to health literacy. Health Promot Int. 2008;23(2):152–9. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dan001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sørensen K, Van den Broucke S, Fullam J, Doyle G, Pelikan J, Slonska Z, et al. Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:80. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-80 - DOI - PMC - PubMed