Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 27;20(6):e0325461.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325461. eCollection 2025.

Short birth spacing and its impact on maternal and child health in India with urban-rural variation: An epidemiological study using the National Family Health Survey Data

Ramendra Nath Kundu  1   2 , Juri Borah  3 , Arna Chatterjee  4 , Koel Mukherjee  5 , Susmita Bharati  6 , Md Golam Hossain  7 , Premananda Bharati  8
Affiliations

Short birth spacing and its impact on maternal and child health in India with urban-rural variation: An epidemiological study using the National Family Health Survey Data

Ramendra Nath Kundu et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Maintaining an appropriate gap between childbirths is essential for promoting the health of both the mother and the child. This practice lowers the risk of adverse maternal and child health outcomes. Inadequate birth spacing is a multifaceted issue linked to increase infant mortality and has the potential to impact the health and demographic landscape of the nation. This study aims to assess the prevalence of short birth spacing (SBS) in association with demographic and socio-economic factors in India with special reference to maternal and child health.

Methods: This study investigated SBS in India using a cross-sectional design and data from the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5). The analysis included data from 636,699 households, encompassing 724,115 women and 139,660 birth intervals. The primary outcome was SBS, and secondary outcomes included maternal undernutrition, full antenatal care (ANC), low birth weight (LBW), infant mortality, and child mortality. The analysis incorporated demographic and socio-economic variables as explanatory factors for SBS. Data analysis was conducted after checking its normality. The data characteristics were summarised and analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics.

Results: In India, SBS is more prevalent (50.8%) with a median of 32 months. Bihar and Andhra Pradesh have shortest spacing (27 months), while Lakshadweep has longest (63.9 months). The Central zone has highest SBS prevalence (53.8%), especially in rural areas (55.9%). SBS is significantly associated with lack of maternal education, younger maternal age, unwanted pregnancies, larger families, and poor wealth index. Additionally, it is found that the explanatory variables have a significant impact on SBS, with area under the curve (AUC) covering 68% to 71% (p < 0.001). Furthermore, SBS has a detrimental effect on maternal and child health as secondary outcomes.

Conclusion: This study emphasizes the substantial influence of socio-demographic factors on the practice of SBS. It is crucial to provide educational programs for mothers that focus on the importance of birth spacing and using family planning services. The study highlights the need to implement economic development initiatives within families to address the factors contributing to inadequate birth spacing. These measures enhance maternal and child health and align with the SDGs in India.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Conceptual framework.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Procedure of the sample selection for the study.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Distribution and urban-rural comparison of birth spacing in India.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Distribution of median-birth spacing across the States/UTs.
Fig 5
Fig 5. AUC for the predicted probability of explanatory variables (adjusted) on SBS.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Effect of SBS on maternal and child health in India with urban and rural variations.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Dhamrait G, Fletcher T, Foo D, Taylor CL, Pereira G. The effects of birth spacing on early childhood development in high-income nations: a systematic review. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:851700. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.851700 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ni W, Gao X, Su X, Cai J, Zhang S, Zheng L, et al. Birth spacing and risk of adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023;102(12):1618–33. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14648 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shakya S, Pokharel PK, Yadav BK. Study on birth spacing and its determinants among women of Kirtipur municipality of Kathmandu district. Int J Nurs Educ. 2011;3(1):56–60.
    1. Winikoff B. The effects of birth spacing on child and maternal health. Stud Fam Plann. 1983;14(10):231–45. - PubMed
    1. Rodriguez G, Hobcraft J, McDonald J, Menken J, Trussell J. A Comparative Analysis of Determinants of Birth Intervals. Voorburg, Netherlands: International Statistical Institute; 1984.

MeSH terms