Assessment of vape shop built environment: airborne nicotine, particulate matter, ventilation, hazard identification, workplace practices, and safety perceptions
- PMID: 40577798
- PMCID: PMC12208366
- DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxaf018
Assessment of vape shop built environment: airborne nicotine, particulate matter, ventilation, hazard identification, workplace practices, and safety perceptions
Abstract
Vape shops are established to sell electronic cigarette (EC) devices, e-liquids or e-juices, and other related accessories. EC use is prominent in vape shops and indoor EC use has been associated with elevated levels of nicotine and particulate matter (PM). This study assessed health and safety conditions, practices, building characteristics, nicotine, and PM concentrations in vape shops during business hours. Sixty-four vape shops were visited but only 15 vape shops consented to participate in this study. The majority of the vape shops had general ventilation (100%) and lounge areas (60%). No workers were observed not to use any personal protective equipment (PPE) such as gloves, aprons, face masks, etc. The mean and standard deviation of the shop volume, air flowrate, and air exchange rate were 12.361 ± 12.990 ft3, 1.203 ± 1.584 ft3/min, and 5.8 ± 2.8 h-1, respectively. The mean and standard deviation of the time-averaged concentration of nicotine, PM2.5, respirable PM, and total PM were 3.92 ± 3.73, 32.01 ± 25.85, 36.03 ± 30.91, and 43.67 ± 34.78 ug/m3, respectively. The nicotine, PM2.5, respirable PM, and total PM levels were significantly below their respective occupational or ambient guideline limits (P < 0.05). The vape shop environments in this study did not appear to pose a significant risk of second-hand exposure to elevated levels of airborne nicotine and PM during business hours.
Keywords: electronic cigarettes; exposure assessment; nicotine; particulate matter; safety; vape shops.
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest relating to the material presented in this article. Its contents, including any opinions and/or conclusions expressed, are solely those of the authors.
Figures
References
-
- ACGIH. TLVs and BEIs. 2020. Cincinnati, OH. https://hse-me.ir/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/2020_TLVs_and_BEIs_The_Docu...
-
- Attfield KR, et al. 2022. Assessment of worker chemical exposures in california vape shops. J Occup Environ Hyg. 19:197–209. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/15459624.2022.2036341 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Berg CJ, et al. 2020. Vape shop identification, density and place characteristics in six metropolitan areas across the us. Prev Med Rep. 19:101137. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101137 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Brief RS, Scala RA.. 1986. Occupational health aspects of unusual work schedules: a review of exxon’s experiences. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 47:199–202. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/15298668691389612 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Callahan-Lyon P. 2014. Electronic cigarettes: human health effects. Tob Control. 23:ii36–ii40. https://doi.org/ 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051470 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous