Evaluation of nursing students' ethical decision-making biases and attitudes toward artificial intelligence in nursing education
- PMID: 40578092
- DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104432
Evaluation of nursing students' ethical decision-making biases and attitudes toward artificial intelligence in nursing education
Abstract
Aim: This study examines nursing students' attitudes toward artificial intelligence (AI) and their association with biases in ethical decision-making processes.
Background: AI technologies are central to healthcare, particularly clinical decision support systems and simulations. While AI accelerates decision-making processes, it also brings ethical responsibilities.
Design: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Method: 265 nursing students were selected through stratified sampling from two universities in Turkey. Data were collected via an online survey using a demographic information form, the AI Attitude Scale (GAAIS) and the Ethical Decision-Making Bias Scale (EDBS).
Results: Most participants were female (n = 223), with an average age of 20.45 (SD 1.67) years. The results of the GAAIS revealed that students generally had a positive attitude (3.38 SD 0.47). However, 36.2 % expressed distrust toward AI students who trusted AI more successfully to solve ethical issues and used AI tools more effectively. The average score on the EDBS was 2.48 SD 0.41. Additionally, students who encountered ethical decisions more frequently (2.30 SD 0.32) showed lower bias levels than those who experienced them less often (2.50SD0.44). Positive attitudes toward AI were positively associated with students' confidence in ethical decision-making (p < 0.05). Distrust in AI and difficulty accessing accurate information were identified as significant barriers.
Conclusions: Attitudes toward AI significantly influence students' biases in ethical decision-making processes. The nursing curriculum should include AI ethics, critical thinking and decision-making skills. Integrating ethical decision-making in AI usage within nursing education can ensure that future nurses can provide patient-centered care while maintaining ethical values.
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence; Bias; Chat-GPT; Ethical Decision-Making; Nursing Education; Nursing Students.
Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to have influenced the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
The relationship between first-year nursing students' innovation skills and attitudes toward artificial intelligence: A multicentre study.Nurse Educ Pract. 2025 Jul;86:104429. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104429. Epub 2025 Jun 14. Nurse Educ Pract. 2025. PMID: 40532276
-
Readiness and Acceptance of Nursing Students Regarding AI-Based Health Care Technology on the Training of Nursing Skills in Saudi Arabia: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR Nurs. 2025 Jul 30;8:e71653. doi: 10.2196/71653. JMIR Nurs. 2025. PMID: 40737490 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacy students' perceptions of artificial intelligence integration in pharmacy practice: Ethical challenges in multiple countries of the MENA region.Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2025 Sep;17(9):102397. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102397. Epub 2025 Jun 5. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2025. PMID: 40480187
-
Artificial Intelligence in Health Education and Practice: A Systematic Review of Health Students' and Academics' Knowledge, Perceptions and Experiences.Int Nurs Rev. 2025 Jun;72(2):e70045. doi: 10.1111/inr.70045. Int Nurs Rev. 2025. PMID: 40545441 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness and experience of arts-based pedagogy among undergraduate nursing students: a mixed methods systematic review.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Nov;14(11):139-239. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003188. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016. PMID: 27941518
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources