Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 26;15(6):e093955.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093955.

Expert consensus on solutions to improve implementation of NICE type 2 diabetes guideline (NG28) by health systems in England: a Delphi panel by the INNOVATE-28 Working Group

Affiliations

Expert consensus on solutions to improve implementation of NICE type 2 diabetes guideline (NG28) by health systems in England: a Delphi panel by the INNOVATE-28 Working Group

Waqas Tahir et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To provide expert consensus recommendations to support health systems in England to improve prioritisation and implementation of cardiovascular and renal risk-based type 2 diabetes (T2D) care, achieving quality improvement in line with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) NG28 guideline.

Design: A two-round modified Delphi panel was conducted.

Setting: Participants represented health system leadership from a cross-section of integrated care systems across England. Delphi panel statements were relevant to both primary and secondary care.

Participants: A panel of 28 participants took part in the Delphi panel (10.7% drop-off rate between rounds). Statement development was guided by a separate committee of 11 topic experts, forming the Implementing NICE NG28 by harnessing Opportunities for adVanced integrated cAre Transformation and Excellence (INNOVATE)-28 Working Group.

Results: In total, 84% (n=32/38) statements reached consensus across both Delphi rounds. There was agreement that health systems need to prioritise prevention of cardiovascular and renal complications in T2D, particularly for those at 'high' or at 'rising' cardiovascular and renal risk. Consensus was also reached that quality improvement should be incentivised based on local population needs, with investment into digital systems and supporting roles to aid this. Panellists further agreed that investment should be channelled into community-led resources to reinforce a preventative approach and help to ensure people living with T2D receive care in the most appropriate setting. Finally, collaboration between health and social care, health innovation networks and industry partners was highlighted as an opportunity to leverage support for the delivery of risk-based T2D care.

Conclusions: The recommendations from this Delphi panel are intended to support health systems to consistently implement the NG28 guideline and facilitate quality improvement to deliver equitable T2D care and mitigate cardiovascular and renal risk. By being innovative and bold with commissioning and ways of working, and leveraging partnerships, health system leaders can enact the transformational and sustainable change needed to improve outcomes for people living with T2D, tackle healthcare inequalities and optimise system resilience.

Keywords: Cardiovascular Disease; Delphi Technique; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Kidney & urinary tract disorders; Risk management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: WT: Funding received from the following companies for providing educational sessions, attendance at conferences and for attending advisory boards: Abbott, Amarin, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dexcom, Eli Lilly, European MedTech, Menarini, MSD, Napp, Novo Nordisk, Roche and Sanofi. HB, GFM, PK: No conflicts of interest disclosed. NK: Recipient of an NIHR Research for Patient Benefits grant. NM: Funding received from the following companies for providing educational sessions, attendance at conferences and for attending advisory boards: Abbott, Ascensia, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Menarini, MSD, MyLan, Napp, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda. JM: Funding received from the following companies for providing educational sessions, attendance at conferences and for attending advisory boards in the past year: AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim- Lilly, Cuviva, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis, Medtronic, Roche. SS: Funding received from the following companies for providing educational sessions, attendance at conferences and for attending advisory boards: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk. MA: Consulting for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MSD, My mHealth, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Summary of Delphi panel participants. (A) Geographical spread of panellists; (B) roles within integrated care systems occupied by panellists recruited. *One participant with this role did not complete Round 2.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Key consensus recommendations from the Delphi panel. AHP, allied health professional; CV, cardiovascular; CVD, cardiovascular disease; HIN, health innovation network; NHS, National Health Service; T2D, type 2 diabetes.

Similar articles

References

    1. Diabetes UK 1 in 10 Adults Living with Diabetes by 2030. [23-May-2024]. https://www.diabetes.org.uk/about-us/news-and-views/1-10-adults-living-d... Available. Accessed.
    1. Diabetes UK Number of People Living With Diabetes In the UK Tops 5 Million for the First Time. [23-May-2024]. https://www.diabetes.org.uk/about-us/news-and-views/number-people-living... Available. Accessed.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Diabetes - type 2: How common is it? Last revised: May 2024. [1-Aug-2024]. https://cks.nice.org.uk/topics/diabetes-type-2/background-information/pr... Available. Accessed.
    1. Valabhji J, Barron E, Pratt A, et al. Prevalence of multiple long-term conditions (multimorbidity) in England: a whole population study of over 60 million people. J R Soc Med. 2024;117:104–17. doi: 10.1177/01410768231206033. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hex N, MacDonald R, Pocock J, et al. Estimation of the direct health and indirect societal costs of diabetes in the UK using a cost of illness model. Diabet Med. 2024;41:e15326. doi: 10.1111/dme.15326. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources