Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Mar-Apr;38(2):378-382.
doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2024.240014R2.

Maintenance of an Asthma Intervention Post-Trial: Use of a Patient-Activated Reliever-Triggered Inhaled Corticosteroid (PARTICS) Strategy in Black and Latinx Patients

Affiliations
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Maintenance of an Asthma Intervention Post-Trial: Use of a Patient-Activated Reliever-Triggered Inhaled Corticosteroid (PARTICS) Strategy in Black and Latinx Patients

Juan Carlos Cardet et al. J Am Board Fam Med. 2025 Mar-Apr.
Free article

Abstract

Purpose: A Patient-Activated Reliever-Triggered Inhaled Corticosteroid (PARTICS) strategy of enhancing usual care with rescue short-acting beta agonist (SABA) supplemented with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) reduces asthma exacerbations vs. usual care alone in Black and Latinx adults with moderate-severe asthma. We investigated post-trial PARTICS usage and patient perceptions of efficacy.

Methods: PREPARE trial participants randomized to the PARTICS intervention were surveyed an average of 29 months after trial exit.

Results: Of 600 PARTICS-assigned PREPARE trial participants, 505 consented to future research. Fifty-two percent (262/505) completed this survey. Forty-one percent (108/262) continued using PARTICS post-trial. Of these, 97% (105/108) reported that PARTICS helped to control their asthma. Thirty-four percent (37/108) switched from the trial provided QVAR® to other ICS brands due to insurance coverage or clinician issues (e.g., unwillingness to prescribe or misunderstanding of PARTICS; 65%, 24/37). Of those who stopped using PARTICS post-trial (59% [154/262]), 62% (95/154) reported using PARTICS until the PREPARE-provided ICS inhaler ran out, and 31% (47/154) reported not knowing that their asthma care clinician could prescribe it. Only 2% (5/154) of those not using PARTICS reported that it had not been helpful for asthma.

Conclusions: Continued PARTICS use was common >2 years post-trial despite minimal study instruction and was perceived as helpful for asthma, suggesting that patients will likely adopt this strategy if implemented at a healthcare system level.

Keywords: Asthma; Black or African American; Bronchodilator; Clinical trial; Healthcare Systems; Implementation Science; Latinx; Metered Dose Inhalers; Minority Health; Patient-Centered Care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: J. C. Cardet reports receiving honoraria from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, GSK, Genentech, and Sanofi for work on advisory boards, steering committees, and educational lectures on asthma. M. Pasarica reports receiving honoraria from NovoNordisk for an educational project on obesity medicine. S. Zaeh served on advisory boards for Astra Zeneca.

Publication types

Substances