Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Aug;39(12):2451-2459.
doi: 10.1038/s41433-025-03890-3. Epub 2025 Jun 27.

Randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled trial of efficacy and safety of quantum molecular resonance for treating meibomian gland dysfunction

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled trial of efficacy and safety of quantum molecular resonance for treating meibomian gland dysfunction

Lita Uthaithammarat et al. Eye (Lond). 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Background: This randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial aimed to evaluate the novel quantum molecular resonance (QMR) device for meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) treatment.

Methods: Eighty participants diagnosed with MGD were randomized into QMR or sham-QMR groups. Each procedure was performed on days 0, 7, 14, and 21. Primary (meibum quality score) and other secondary outcomes were examined at baseline and weeks 7 and 11. Tear osmolarity and interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-1 receptor agonist levels were evaluated at baseline and week 7. Adverse events were recorded. A multilevel mixed-effect linear regression model was used for data analysis.

Results: Meibum quality (p = 0.008), corneal/conjunctival fluorescein staining score (p = 0.036), telangiectatic vessel area (p = 0.008), and superior (p = 0.011) and inferior (p = 0.020) lid meiboscale were significantly improved in the QMR group than those in the sham-treated group at week 11. Superior lid meiboscale (p = 0.027) and meibomian gland plugging grade (MGPG) (p = 0.017) were significantly improved in the QMR group at week 7. In the QMR group, Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores and lid margin thickening grades were significantly lesser at weeks 7 (p = 0.002 and <0.001, respectively) and 11 (both p < 0.001) than the baseline values. At week 7, IL-6 levels were significantly decreased only in the QMR group (p = 0.016). All other parameters did not significantly differ. No serious adverse event occurred.

Conclusions: The QMR device was effective for MGD treatment, with improvements in meibum quality, corneal/conjunctival staining, telangiectatic vessels, MGPG, superior and inferior lid meiboscale, and decreased OSDI score, lid margin thickening grade, and tear IL-6 level.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Eight outcomes in the QRM and sham-QRM groups at baseline and 7- and 11-week follow-ups.
A Meibum quality score, B Ocular Surface Disease Index score, C tear meniscus height, D noninvasive tear break-up time, E bulbar conjunctival hyperemia, F tear film lipid layer thickness, G tear osmolarity, and H sodium fluorescein staining score. + p < 0.05, comparison between the two study groups; * p < 0.05, comparison with baseline within each study group. QMR quantum molecular resonance.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Eight outcomes in the QRM and sham-QRM groups at baseline and 7- and 11-week follow-ups.
A Schirmer’s test, B area of telangiectasia vessels, C lid margin thickening grade, D lid margin irregularity grade, E meibomian gland plugging grade, F superior lid meiboscale, G inferior lid meiboscale, and H meibum expressibility grade. + p < 0.05, comparison between the two study groups; * p < 0.05, comparison with baseline within each study group. QMR quantum molecular resonance.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Logarithmic mean values of tear cytokine levels in the QRM and sham-QRM groups at baseline and 7-week follow-up.
Levels of (A) interleukin-6 and (B) interleukin-1 receptor antagonist in tear fluid. * p < 0.05, comparison with baseline within each study group. QMR quantum molecular resonance.

Similar articles

References

    1. Knop E, Knop N, Millar T, Obata H, Sullivan DA. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the subcommittee on anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology of the meibomian gland. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:1938–78. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Geerling G, Tauber J, Baudouin C, Goto E, Matsumoto Y, O’Brien T, et al. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the subcommittee on management and treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:2050–64. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Trivli A, Karmiris E, Dalianis G, Ruggeri A, Terzidou C. Evaluating the efficacy of Quantum Molecular Resonance (QMR) electrotherapy in mixed-type dry eye patients. J Optom. 2022;16:128–34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferrari G, Colucci A, Barbariga M, Ruggeri A, Rama P. High frequency electrotherapy for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction. Cornea. 2019;38:1424–9. - PubMed
    1. Pedrotti E, Bosello F, Fasolo A, Frigo AC, Marchesoni I, Ruggeri A, et al. Transcutaneous periorbital electrical stimulation in the treatment of dry eye. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101:814–9. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources