Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jan 16;15(1):ibaf027.
doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaf027.

Supporting disability-inclusive knowledge translation and patient access to knowledge: A synthesis of select special education theories

Affiliations
Review

Supporting disability-inclusive knowledge translation and patient access to knowledge: A synthesis of select special education theories

John C Hayvon et al. Transl Behav Med. .

Abstract

Equitable access to knowledge and knowledge translation that is inclusive to marginalized patients-including those whose health conditions have resulted in lifelong disability-may be supportive of health equity. In enhancing the evidence base of what constitutes disability-inclusive knowledge translation, patients may be better supported in their health literacy, self-management, or autonomy in making health-related decisions. To identify potential guiding principles from the discipline of special education that has been invested in providing equitable access to knowledge for patients living with disabilities across all age groups. Qualitative synthesis of existing theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs) in special education is performed to identify constructs which may guide disability-inclusive knowledge translation. A search methodology adapted from PRISMA-ScR was conducted in Web of Science and Scopus to identify review-type studies in special education scholarship. A total of 69 unique review-type studies were retrieved in the English language, resulting in 21 meeting the inclusion criteria of presenting a special education TMF with potential to inform knowledge translation. Ten themes emerged through data charting of theoretical constructs, as well as open coding of five studies. Findings that may promote disability-inclusive knowledge translation are presented in a synthesized framework with 25 considerations. Special education TMFs are diverse in focus; this first-steps study illustrates significant potential of special education TMFs in informing disability-inclusive knowledge translation. Future studies that engage with a more expansive set of special education TMFs will bring value to implementation science.

Keywords: communications; frameworks; health inequalities; implementation science; knowledge mobilization; models; review; theories.

Plain language summary

This study conducts a first-step review of theories, models, and frameworks in the field of special education to assess guiding principles that enhance the equitable access to health information for patients who live with disabilities. After retrieving 69 studies with 21 meeting the criteria set out by this paper for review, a conceptual framework with 25 considerations that may support patients is drafted in this paper. Broadly speaking, the themes relate to how health professionals may consider the following leverage points: the environment in which information is presented; enhancing interactivity of information; considering both the promotional and hindering role of family and service providers; the validity of emotion in learning new information; modeling as method to convey information; the nuances of involving technology; acknowledging the diversity among individual patients living with disabilities; vision on the learning and access to knowledge as contextualized within social inequalities which may present barriers to patients; and supporting the goal-setting, self-reflection, and advocacy efforts of patients as desirable outcomes of information-sharing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Hojjati A, Beavis ASW, Kassam A, et al. Educational content related to postcolonialism and indigenous health inequities recommended for all rehabilitation students in Canada: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil 2018;40:3206–16. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/09638288.2017.1381185 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McLoughlin GM, Kumanyika S, Su Y, et al. Mending the gap: measurement needs to address policy implementation through a health equity lens. Transl Behav Med 2024;14:207–14. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/tbm/ibae004. https://academic-oup-com.login.ezproxy.library.ualberta.ca/tbm/article-p... (30 August 2024, date last accessed). - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Snell-Rood C, Jaramillo ET, Hamilton AB, et al. Advancing health equity through a theoretically critical implementation science. Transl Behav Med 2021;11:1617–25. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/tbm/ibab008. https://academic.oup.com/tbm/article-abstract/11/8/1617/6255524 (15 January 2024, date last accessed). - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Geukes C, Bruland D, Latteck A-D.. Health literacy in people with intellectual disabilities: a mixed-method literature review. Kontakt 2018;20:e416–23. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1212411718300679 (10 April 2024, date last accessed).
    1. Morton Ninomiya ME, Atkinson D, Brascoupé S, et al. Effective knowledge translation approaches and practices in Indigenous health research: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev 2017;6:34. https://doi.org/ 10.1186/s13643-017-0430-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms