Hemodynamic changes and mid-term results of surgical correction of de novo aortic valve insufficiency after left ventricular assist device implantation
- PMID: 40580275
- DOI: 10.1007/s10047-025-01516-9
Hemodynamic changes and mid-term results of surgical correction of de novo aortic valve insufficiency after left ventricular assist device implantation
Abstract
Severe aortic insufficiency (AI) is a common complication associated with prolonged continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) therapy. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes after surgical correction of de novo AI after LVAD implantation. A total of 190 patients underwent CF-LVAD implantation between January 2013 and June 2022. Of these, 24 had trivial or no AI before LVAD implantation and developed moderate or greater de novo AI after LVAD implantation. Patients who underwent aortic valve surgery before or concomitant with LVAD surgery were excluded. Among the 24 patients, surgeries were indicated for medically refractory de novo AI in 11 patients, who were included. The primary outcome was postoperative improvement in hemodynamics as assessed by right heart catheter examination, and the secondary endpoints were 3-year survival and freedom from death and/or heart failure readmission rates. The correction of de novo AI was accomplished with aortic valve closure using a bovine pericardial patch in 10 patients and prosthetic valve replacement in one patient. Significant differences (all p < 0.01) in pre- vs. post-surgery pulmonary artery wedge pressure, cardiac index, and mixed venous blood oxygen saturation were found. The mean follow-up period after LVAD implantation was 1413 days, and the 3-year survival rate was 90.9%. Three-year freedom from postoperative moderate or greater AI rate and freedom from heart failure readmission rate were both 90.9%. Postoperative hemodynamic status and survival outcomes are favorable in patients who underwent surgical aortic valve repair de novo AI after LVAD implantation.
Keywords: Aortic insufficiency; Ventricular assisted device.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. IRB information: This study was conducted with patient data retrieved from institutional medical record, was approved by the institutional ethics committee of Osaka University Hospital, and written informed consent from each patient was waived for this retrospective study (Reference no. 23306).
Similar articles
-
Percutaneous Transcatheter Interventions for Aortic Insufficiency in Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.ASAIO J. 2017 Mar/Apr;63(2):117-122. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000447. ASAIO J. 2017. PMID: 27676407
-
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 10;4(4):CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Dec 6;12:CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub3. PMID: 28394022 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Outcomes of concomitant aortic valve procedures and left ventricular assist device implantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Artif Organs. 2023 Mar;47(3):470-480. doi: 10.1111/aor.14482. Epub 2022 Dec 20. Artif Organs. 2023. PMID: 36537993
-
The clinical and cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices for end-stage heart failure: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2005 Nov;9(45):1-132, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9450. Health Technol Assess. 2005. PMID: 16303098
-
Association of Aortic Root and Valve Morphology With De Novo Aortic Valve Regurgitation After Implantation of Left Ventricular Assist Device.Artif Organs. 2025 Mar 12;49(8):1339-45. doi: 10.1111/aor.14987. Online ahead of print. Artif Organs. 2025. PMID: 40071517 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Al Danaf J, Butler J, Yehya A. Updates on device-based therapies for patients with heart failure. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2018;15:53–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11897-018-0384-x . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Michaels A, Cowger J. Patient selection for destination LVAD therapy: predicting success in the short and long term. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2019;16:140–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11897-019-00434-1 . (PMID: 31240639). - DOI - PubMed
-
- Rose EA, Gelijns AC, Moskowitz AJ, et al. Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1435–43. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa012175 . (PMID: 11794191). - DOI - PubMed
-
- Molina EJ, Shah P, Kiernan MS, et al. The society of thoracic surgeons intermacs 2020 annual report. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021;111:778–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.12.038 . (PMID: 33465365). - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kirklin JK, Pagani FD, Kormos RL, et al. Eighth annual INTERMACS report. Eighth annual INTERMACS report: special focus on framing the impact of adverse events. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36:1080–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2017.07.005 . - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources