Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 28.
doi: 10.1007/s10047-025-01516-9. Online ahead of print.

Hemodynamic changes and mid-term results of surgical correction of de novo aortic valve insufficiency after left ventricular assist device implantation

Affiliations

Hemodynamic changes and mid-term results of surgical correction of de novo aortic valve insufficiency after left ventricular assist device implantation

Takashi Murakami et al. J Artif Organs. .

Abstract

Severe aortic insufficiency (AI) is a common complication associated with prolonged continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) therapy. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes after surgical correction of de novo AI after LVAD implantation. A total of 190 patients underwent CF-LVAD implantation between January 2013 and June 2022. Of these, 24 had trivial or no AI before LVAD implantation and developed moderate or greater de novo AI after LVAD implantation. Patients who underwent aortic valve surgery before or concomitant with LVAD surgery were excluded. Among the 24 patients, surgeries were indicated for medically refractory de novo AI in 11 patients, who were included. The primary outcome was postoperative improvement in hemodynamics as assessed by right heart catheter examination, and the secondary endpoints were 3-year survival and freedom from death and/or heart failure readmission rates. The correction of de novo AI was accomplished with aortic valve closure using a bovine pericardial patch in 10 patients and prosthetic valve replacement in one patient. Significant differences (all p < 0.01) in pre- vs. post-surgery pulmonary artery wedge pressure, cardiac index, and mixed venous blood oxygen saturation were found. The mean follow-up period after LVAD implantation was 1413 days, and the 3-year survival rate was 90.9%. Three-year freedom from postoperative moderate or greater AI rate and freedom from heart failure readmission rate were both 90.9%. Postoperative hemodynamic status and survival outcomes are favorable in patients who underwent surgical aortic valve repair de novo AI after LVAD implantation.

Keywords: Aortic insufficiency; Ventricular assisted device.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. IRB information: This study was conducted with patient data retrieved from institutional medical record, was approved by the institutional ethics committee of Osaka University Hospital, and written informed consent from each patient was waived for this retrospective study (Reference no. 23306).

Similar articles

References

    1. Al Danaf J, Butler J, Yehya A. Updates on device-based therapies for patients with heart failure. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2018;15:53–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11897-018-0384-x . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Michaels A, Cowger J. Patient selection for destination LVAD therapy: predicting success in the short and long term. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2019;16:140–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11897-019-00434-1 . (PMID: 31240639). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rose EA, Gelijns AC, Moskowitz AJ, et al. Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1435–43. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa012175 . (PMID: 11794191). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Molina EJ, Shah P, Kiernan MS, et al. The society of thoracic surgeons intermacs 2020 annual report. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021;111:778–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.12.038 . (PMID: 33465365). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kirklin JK, Pagani FD, Kormos RL, et al. Eighth annual INTERMACS report. Eighth annual INTERMACS report: special focus on framing the impact of adverse events. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36:1080–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2017.07.005 . - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources