Impact of a multidisciplinary pain management team on acute and chronic pain management after total knee arthroplasty
- PMID: 40580328
- PMCID: PMC12647191
- DOI: 10.1007/s00540-025-03529-3
Impact of a multidisciplinary pain management team on acute and chronic pain management after total knee arthroplasty
Abstract
Purpose: The impact of multidisciplinary team (MDT) interventions on chronic postsurgical pain remains unclear. This study evaluated the effects of MDT on acute and chronic pain outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 324 patients who underwent unilateral TKA between April 2017 and March 2023. The patients were divided into pre-MDT (n = 147) and post-MDT (n = 177) groups. The MDT, comprising anesthesiologists, pain nurses, and pharmacists, conducted daily rounds from postoperative day (POD) 1 to 4. The acute (duration of nerve block, incidence of breakthrough pain [BTP]) and chronic outcomes at 3 months (movement-related numerical rating scale [NRS] scores, regular analgesic use) were compared. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results: The preoperative demographics were comparable between groups. The MDT significantly prolonged nerve block duration (2.7 ± 1.0 vs. 3.0 ± 1.5 days, p = 0.027) and reduced BTP incidence (50.3 vs. 29.4%, p = 0.0001). At 3 months, movement-related NRS scores were lower in the post-MDT group (4.2 ± 3.5 vs. 2.1 ± 2.4, p = 0.025), while regular analgesic use showed no significant difference (21.8 vs. 16.9%, p = 0.31).
Conclusion: MDT intervention improved acute pain management by reducing BTP and ensuring optimal nerve block use. Additionally, MDT was associated with better chronic pain outcomes, reflected in lower movement-related NRS scores at 3 months. These findings highlight MDTs' role in improving acute pain management and reducing movement-related pain at 3 months after TKA.
Keywords: Acute pain management; Chronic postsurgical pain; Multidisciplinary pain management team; Total knee arthroplasty.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors report that there is no conflict of interest. Ethics approval: This study was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of Osaka University Hospital (approval no. 21489). This study was conducted in strict accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (World Medical Association, 1964) and its subsequent revisions, which set internationally accepted ethical standards for research involving human subjects. Consent to participate: This study employed an opt-out method in accordance with the ethical guidelines. Written informed consent was not obtained from any participant. Instead, comprehensive information about the study's purpose, procedures, risks, and handling of personal information was made available to potential participants through posters displayed in areas frequented by the target population, and pamphlets placed or distributed at relevant locations.
Figures
Comment in
-
Total knee arthroplasty: considerations for multidisciplinary teams in patients' postsurgical pain management.J Anesth. 2025 Sep 4. doi: 10.1007/s00540-025-03574-y. Online ahead of print. J Anesth. 2025. PMID: 40906290 No abstract available.
-
Integrating a multidisciplinary pain management team and patient-reported outcomes into enhanced recovery after total knee arthroplasty.J Anesth. 2025 Sep 13. doi: 10.1007/s00540-025-03576-w. Online ahead of print. J Anesth. 2025. PMID: 40940621 No abstract available.
References
-
- Terkawi AS, Mavridis D, Sessler DI, Nunemaker MS, Doais KS, Terkawi RS, Terkawi YS, Petropoulou M, Nemergut EC. Pain management modalities after total knee arthroplasty: a network meta-analysis of 170 randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology. 2017;126(5):923–37. 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001607. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
