Pain perceived during hysteroscopic morcellation by vaginoscopy versus standard technique in an outpatient setting: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 40580658
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.114544
Pain perceived during hysteroscopic morcellation by vaginoscopy versus standard technique in an outpatient setting: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Objective: To compare pain perceived in women undergoing polyp or fibroid morcellation with a 5.5 mm MyoSure hysteroscope by vaginoscopy vs standard technique, both under sedation in an outpatient setting.
Subjects: Women between the ages 18-52 years; with a clear indication for operative hysteroscopy such as a polyp or type 0/1 fibroid measuring <2 cm, or <4 cm total when more than one lesion was present.
Method: Randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized into two groups: Group 1 underwent hysteroscopic morcellation using the standard technique, while Group 2 underwent the procedure via vaginoscopy. The primary outcome measured was the participants' self-rated pain perception using the 10-point visual analog scale. The secondary outcomes included duration of the intervention, blood loss, complication at one week follow-up and pregnancy rate at 6 and 12 months. The study was conducted in an outpatient fertility clinic in a tertiary university hospital.
Results: A total of 78 patients were included in the final analysis, with 39 patients per group. Participant baseline characteristics were similar in each group. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the standard technique was found to be significantly less painful than vaginoscopy (mean score 4.0 vs 5.9; difference in means 1.9; p = 0.001). No differences were demonstrated for operative time, postprocedural bleeding, or complication rate. Pregnancy outcomes, including pregnancy rate and pregnancy loss at 6 and 12 months, were not statistically different between the two groups.
Conclusion: Standard technique for polyps or fibroids removal is less painful than vaginoscopy in women under sedation in an outpatient setting using 5.5 mm MyoSure hysteroscope. Therefore, it should be considered the technique of choice.
Keywords: Ambulatory hysteroscopy; Hysteroscopic morcellation; Office hysteroscopy; Operative hysteroscopy; Pain assessment; Pain relief; Vaginoscopy.
Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Minimally invasive surgical techniques versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroids.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 21;2014(10):CD004638. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004638.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 25331441 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of whether there is residual polyp tissue after hysteroscopic morcellation at Cam and Sakura City Hospital: a retrospective cohort study.BMC Womens Health. 2024 Feb 20;24(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-02978-4. BMC Womens Health. 2024. PMID: 38378558 Free PMC article.
-
Uterine distension media for outpatient hysteroscopy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 26;11(11):CD006604. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006604.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34826139 Free PMC article.
-
Pain management for tubal sterilization by hysteroscopy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD009251. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009251.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 22895987 Free PMC article.
-
Approach to abnormal uterine bleeding in presence of endometrial polyps with new hysteroscopic devices.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Jul;312(1):257-265. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-08005-7. Epub 2025 Mar 29. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025. PMID: 40156637 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical